From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50256: thing-at-mouse Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 09:50:14 +0200 Message-ID: <361bb63a-5e29-9785-0785-6c46f6621223@gmx.at> References: <87sfys6ubm.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871r6a8ooe.fsf@gnus.org> <87y28i85xi.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87k0k1o5ks.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87ilzk6bsr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <6dcf3191-dbb3-0c6c-2483-0fc05e9ff6e5@gmx.at> <83lf4gqyn9.fsf@gnu.org> <1a65f234-c1ee-ae95-aa05-2e3d9d1e1002@gmx.at> <8335qoqobm.fsf@gnu.org> <7c9cb0a1-b222-cb06-7e7c-7f17231faca3@gmx.at> <83pmtsp4g1.fsf@gnu.org> <831r67ph8d.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuj3bffb.fsf@gnus.org> <83y28fo1xf.fsf@gnu.org> <191e9cc6-7370-5b7d-7777-716b61e0155d@gmx.at> <83pmtrnydh.fsf@gnu.org> <158a8854-f56a-9aaa-3a14-d108e086a24c@gmx.at> <83k0jznms2.fsf@gnu.org> <87v93j9dfz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87y28e4ysv.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83czpqzupp.fsf@gnu.org> <83v93hyl3l.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfykwyyb.fsf@gnu.org> <087851c3-b3b1-5130-f4b1-50cd42ef83a8@gmx.at> <83ilzgwp2w.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23441"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 50256@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, juri@linkov.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 05 09:51:25 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mMmw0-0005xQ-FX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 09:51:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48194 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMmvy-0008HP-5v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 03:51:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57786) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMmve-0008HB-SV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 03:51:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37544) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMmve-0002YQ-LQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 03:51:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mMmve-0006pE-G3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 03:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 07:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50256 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50256-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50256.163082823126180 (code B ref 50256); Sun, 05 Sep 2021 07:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50256) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2021 07:50:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49087 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mMmv8-0006oC-Nq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 03:50:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:50815) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mMmv6-0006nu-74 for 50256@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 03:50:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1630828221; bh=vusW+SqqlQY8MemxJxZK3zNA7EvZzZl8Qb1rorSd/hU=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=BBl02i2zxYyfzbzZ3agVp9yo45Ukb/c0pdf1rSiVMWhPbsAqgRfRyPeo5CNi/JV7H Wi4qTUj2TdCXh3nBf+L4A+hFxqpbi5VbTjfrNShmbOaeInzB5jaUfODJB/JY5WRzMA xIvGVfXodYURFVurVD3A9dYWeE8yPdqEDGuvbPxE= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([212.95.5.92]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N3siG-1n4oqj1DBA-00zkfK; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 09:50:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83ilzgwp2w.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:VSNwU3mYpN+5+mPMCZ+LkEl5WnFM+wAg3q+TlVgmZZdMlMeX1uF f6dz8OWqF8aYcDWLNTi876exYSYbnKCfpqhd/6AhMvyjarHNoqasdLapv7oULWuVYfLBoyz PGXz6hVwqjcXThJmr5nSGGn2PYMcQ2pvWpqT+rhhgfDjQvmFVlwhqyPTaNlgVvJrs1+OAxn fTY2X50GJu98wXb47vS1w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:rgrz1b2BDJ8=:VTEWXtyXbJZqh/sV8+zOuB /aFtJOf/1PyZVyZ0JNWNdMHz85LFRA+L52NQnRagWXIgob5VKNobWKU7UotGdCPFhLzbDkk2a R/vURJeKMWeL70fQzcY8UsF9nKYynf+Pxy/25VTp8UWD8aDE7oof0jv8ZjUHNkpKX4/aNnwtB a8AjqkQIrM+Doo3w3pn8ZIJcq7NjInynpXx+lTmlPnoEC9uIG4hUBh96elj0mNNJtIYwDMVGG K8SWH6m7hhDEXvXI5JSDUxW0h15nkSangFONGJZJdVhsyXgu4fsxDgZPTnx7cbaLQ0fsc8Tyw bKBVz5W0QCit19OzENelt8BeHODJlyaraM9rw1HV8yqDrjW+/AubySFf+7STjjEoG6IsPh7BH SPlVvfqZV9nBoou5BNV5SndtNETou6EuGGpalfymuMi1Iuo8M7B6V4Nlcn2WT0UoJf4ZgQr4m dr/ZOl7NSTUbSYEUk3zPneykC8tpg3PnnvnbbkD4JZj/I02pQGguoDHbIeMkAa3wb2SWJe8pC cS+33B7EAKWvxVuKO5vfkLHnNmp8/tijkH7lnDEUbglbGoqEK1i1JPDylza6I9eHIsBcKGrf2 zQM9i/VYbFodKa4ambrOps8VEH6NiPm5cLIuiigHDpc882qNHRBmD6Y5RRnKKVM2EXVf80Qm+ pQwhu27HhHTdcdCpT7BjAe232HyXXvVb7ordJGmR4TZBpvuZ4tsI9tporzWzzMWRMWIgx2ml+ bi/3QXCGfoWX89W06BszpBb/GgP//9pzQPcmFbpVFcrYZlKAs2MchaspfQJMDhebU6+WZBIw X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:213463 Archived-At: >> > That's orthogonal. (And it seems to issue the warning in an unrelated >> > case, handled by the 'else' clause?) >> >> Which case? > > This one: > >> + else >> + posint = marker_position (w->pointm); You mean when the caller asks for using point in a non-selected window that does not show the current buffer. Why do you think this case is unrelated and/or should be handled differently? >> Maybe I have not been making myself clear. What I would apply is the >> attached (modulo any errors it contains): No change in behavior, just a >> warning in the doc-string and suspicious calls. > > That doesn't fix the problem which started this thread, does it? Right. We have two ways to fix that problem: (1) Fix it in a general way. You don't want to do that because it might harm calls of that function that silently worked until now. (2) Fix it by modifying the calls of `pos-visible-in-window-p'. In that case the warning should help us find the calls that should be fixed. martin