From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Krzysztof =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=BBelechowski?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10107: 23.2; Add command gud-quit Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 15:04:27 +0200 Message-ID: <3523241.YgWQDmMeQI@localhost.localdomain> References: <8762icpcus.fsf@linux-4qi7.site> <2011306.fv05nxKMY0@localhost.localdomain> <87lf7nqhrk.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39403"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 10107@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 06 15:09:09 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lpsWb-0009zL-PB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 15:09:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33650 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpsWa-0004yE-82 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 09:09:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37332) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpsWU-0004y5-Bf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 09:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39435) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpsWU-0002ba-2V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 09:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lpsWT-0005iu-UI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 09:09:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Krzysztof =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=BBelechowski?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 13:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10107 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 10107-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10107.162298491221961 (code B ref 10107); Sun, 06 Jun 2021 13:09:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10107) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2021 13:08:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50981 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lpsVz-0005i9-Qf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 09:08:31 -0400 Original-Received: from shark2.2a.pl ([213.77.90.2]:61380 helo=shark.2a.pl) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lpsVu-0005hq-08 for 10107@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 09:08:29 -0400 Original-Received: from wrasse.2a.pl (wrasse.2a.pl [213.77.90.7]) by shark.2a.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC4A3175080A; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 15:08:19 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at 2a.pl Original-Received: from shark.2a.pl ([213.77.90.2]) by wrasse.2a.pl (wrasse.2a.pl [213.77.90.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6oIf3dDbpMhV; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 15:05:59 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [10.8.1.26]) by shark.2a.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 608FC175080F; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 15:06:57 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87lf7nqhrk.fsf@gnus.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:208126 Archived-At: Dnia niedziela, 6 czerwca 2021 14:50:23 CEST Lars Ingebrigtsen pisze: > Krzysztof =AFelechowski writes: > > While the binding I chose might be inappropriate, the new command > > would kill the underlying process but leave the buffer for further > > examination. >=20 > Oh, I see -- you just want a command that kills the process in the > current buffer? >=20 > Sure, that's something that I think sounds generally useful (for > instance to kill an out-of-control process that's inserting something in > the buffer), and there doesn't seem to be such a command? >=20 > The `delete-process' function does this (with no parameters it'll kill > the process in the current buffer), so we could just slap an interactive > spec on it and make it a command. (Assigning a keystroke to it might > perhaps be overkill.) Imagine yourself as an operator at the Knight Capital Group. You can see=20 ongoing damage but you still want to preserve the log. What would you rath= er =20 use, a keyboard accelerator or a long command? Chris