From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Van Ly Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#53534: 28.0.91; on netbsd 'gmake install' outputs 'find: chown: No such file or directory' Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 15:06:18 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Super Dimensional Fortress Message-ID: <34ea3c43-b527-eae2-9f21-404317ed6f3@SDF.ORG> References: <83zgnjgoig.fsf@gnu.org> <5wr18vdsw3.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83r18uhde4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40386"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Glenn Morris , 53534@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 26 16:08:29 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nCjuP-000AHs-G2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 16:08:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39822 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCjuO-00073a-Fv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 10:08:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36048) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCjt0-0005M4-K5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 10:07:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60230) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCjt0-00078O-9y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 10:07:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nCjt0-0004CO-1x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 10:07:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Van Ly Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 15:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53534 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 53534-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53534.164320958716098 (code B ref 53534); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 15:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 53534) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2022 15:06:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53133 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nCjsO-0004BY-VM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 10:06:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:64201) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nCjsL-0004BM-Vx for 53534@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 10:06:24 -0500 Original-Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:van.ly@faeroes.freeshell.org [205.166.94.9]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 20QF6KGD000461 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 15:06:21 GMT Original-Received: from localhost (van.ly@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id 20QF6Iak008543; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 15:06:18 GMT In-Reply-To: <83r18uhde4.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:225272 Archived-At: On Wed, 26 Jan 2022, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Isn't it customary to use sudo when installing stuff? > Taking GNU Screen as an example, the settings for the system go in /etc/screenrc, which would need chown to install in the first place, the user can install their settings in ~/.screenrc, without use of chown. >> I guess they are to deal with tar defaulting to --same-owner for root. > > Most probably. > > In any case, I don't see any serious problem in the reported behavior, > those are just warnings AFAIU. > I hesistated before reporting this bug, thinking my storage device had wornout and was spewing the error. I got around to fscking then reported this. A better looking log trace collapses and counts the repeating line and explains chown is not on the path is a help to know. The autogen.sh script can detect chown is not on the path, right? -- vl