From: "Jan D." <jan.h.d@swipnet.se>
To: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
Cc: "emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org" <emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org>,
Robert Marshall <robert.marshall@tnei.co.uk>,
"4375@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com"
<4375@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>
Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:57:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <34B7CAAB-80E6-4106-B896-96A82F028AE5@swipnet.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19112.9315.801126.825982@totara.tehura.co.nz>
9 sep 2009 kl. 23.55 skrev nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts):
>>> Is installing Gdb 7.0 not an option once it has been released?
>>
>> I don't understand this question.
>
> I wondered what was preventing Jan from using GDB 7.0.
>
Different things. Policy for one, i.e. the tools to use are version
controlled locally. Much work for another. Many older distros will
never upgrade Gdb. To compile it on many machines is a big job (I
don't mind doing it for Emacs since I test and develop Emacs).
IMHO this 7.0 requirement will make gdb-mode useless for the majority
of users. Do we even know if 7.0 is released before 23.2 is? The
strength of gdb-mode in the past is that you just did M-x gdb and it
worked with whatever Gdb version you had.
Jan D.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-10 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4AA8BA2E.3020005@tnei.co.uk>
2009-09-08 15:08 ` bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Robert Marshall
2009-09-08 22:48 ` Nick Roberts
2009-09-09 7:22 ` Robert Marshall
2009-09-09 9:12 ` Nick Roberts
2009-09-09 10:41 ` Jan D.
2009-09-09 11:13 ` Nick Roberts
2009-09-09 14:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-09 21:55 ` Nick Roberts
2009-09-10 3:29 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-10 4:13 ` Nick Roberts
2009-09-10 9:04 ` Jan D.
2009-09-10 9:09 ` Jan D.
2009-09-10 8:57 ` Jan D. [this message]
2009-09-10 10:03 ` Nick Roberts
2009-09-10 3:09 ` Nick Roberts
2009-09-10 8:36 ` Robert Marshall
2009-09-10 3:49 ` Nick Roberts
2009-09-10 9:09 ` Robert Marshall
2009-09-10 10:08 ` Nick Roberts
2009-09-10 14:28 ` Robert Marshall
2009-09-10 21:37 ` Nick Roberts
2009-09-11 13:24 ` Robert Marshall
2009-09-10 8:45 ` bug#4375: marked as done (23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer) Emacs bug Tracking System
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=34B7CAAB-80E6-4106-B896-96A82F028AE5@swipnet.se \
--to=jan.h.d@swipnet.se \
--cc=4375@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com \
--cc=emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org \
--cc=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
--cc=robert.marshall@tnei.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).