From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steve Purcell Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20231: 25.0.50; package.el mangles non-ascii content in downloaded archive-contents data Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 19:48:48 +0100 Message-ID: <332EEC93-8D2B-43C0-AD16-6655DEEF56FA@sanityinc.com> References: <6343E9EC-9E23-4D44-9CD1-82C26DB7CDA3@sanityinc.com> <8292DA72-0898-47B2-A1C1-F7D94A52A437@sanityinc.com> <83pp7aef53.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1428778162 10328 80.91.229.3 (11 Apr 2015 18:49:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 18:49:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20231@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 11 20:49:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yh0Sr-0004Oe-Rq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 20:49:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43575 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yh0Sr-0004R6-8x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 14:49:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57011) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yh0Sn-0004R1-Rb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 14:49:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yh0Sk-0006zI-L9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 14:49:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35399) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yh0Sk-0006yR-IR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 14:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yh0Sk-0007L7-3Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 14:49:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Steve Purcell Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 18:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20231 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20231-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20231.142877814028205 (code B ref 20231); Sat, 11 Apr 2015 18:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20231) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2015 18:49:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53408 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yh0Si-0007Kr-5A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 14:49:00 -0400 Original-Received: from purcellpeople.com ([85.214.32.38]:34291 helo=h1189701.stratoserver.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Yh0Se-0007Ka-IY for 20231@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 14:48:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.103] (host31-48-107-253.range31-48.btcentralplus.com [31.48.107.253]) by h1189701.stratoserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF8DD82008A; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 20:48:49 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83pp7aef53.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:101436 Archived-At: On 11 Apr 2015, at 18:41, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >=20 > 'utf-8 or 'utf-8-unix? Or is that unimportant in this case? It=E2=80=99s not important in this case, but I suppose the latter would = make it even more explicit.=