From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36859: Customizable fit-window-to-buffer Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 09:27:12 +0200 Message-ID: <3323fa25-d095-06d1-6318-a902ba70c844@gmx.at> References: <87sgqnp9z8.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <6a42d2af-b17a-d2da-1c3c-655f3f2a356f@gmx.at> <87sgqmq67t.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <1d94d43d-45d8-c917-426f-f3ba8c0feabf@gmx.at> <87wofuue1e.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87ef20wzuw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <1779fe6f-3196-a6f9-99af-4344008be1ae@gmx.at> <878ss7tgmh.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <1b0ee8ff-2fbb-ad3e-3554-fd73399af4eb@gmx.at> <87r25yq6se.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87o910my8p.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="263497"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 36859@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 08 09:28:09 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hvcqG-0016ST-GY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 09:28:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47362 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hvcqF-0003bc-Iy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 03:28:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55588) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hvcqB-0003Za-5f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 03:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hvcqA-0001Za-BS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 03:28:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59271) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hvcqA-0001ZW-7U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 03:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hvcqA-0006V5-17 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 03:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 07:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36859 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36859-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36859.156524924724902 (code B ref 36859); Thu, 08 Aug 2019 07:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36859) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Aug 2019 07:27:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39859 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hvcpa-0006Ta-W1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 03:27:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:34785) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hvcpY-0006TE-EZ for 36859@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 03:27:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1565249233; bh=IACTDtqonj0Ps1liSPwSQ2pL9RhwgzmUKvmMaT32BmM=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=WMpJsxzoggad1UkcFDzjZtSGnOrL783Zesjk9YzBGO+6xJF8KGCRtSuQ+srju9un7 hNZEnJcGM2rpRgpm5s76kS+AhcPEsLJ/Km5JUpXO1xDzapR690Qu3BZ3na+/CsTjli R6ReOmPfjtfYICmMtnRnLUodIqS3xh+c/DvKk0HA= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([213.162.80.111]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LvPgd-1iL1c20HZb-010dxk; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 09:27:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87o910my8p.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Content-Language: de-DE X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:2wlXtZsxZzNv+JiRnZ/fzSMP9lrb3ueVdUwYWKLQliAKaMjhshX bLoEi9ICQQMTWG6U3MoUmiKiYGejjXLhxKdx8HCkV6Pm3BB72ZoTcHlWlt1p4Ffn0U2wApy 0FkGzq3z1gPwuwQR+mCY4ioXdfhVxMTtnxacd+ouOraXEUsIe/z0fpOxGvU0i7mbUgiyGBU /PC9Niju3Ff23l378IPrg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:2Fqli2rO5c0=:fbmeZPiSl3XGLjco/hWZeU fkWZcmg+KoGEZsJYp4Z6Gf54uNpcJUrLYt4kxGi8/jGQPmehxA1RocfcH0jaHFAtU09xg3YL+ QfEB7OgJYuuhG/9zzVJ6VlRetzhrrBfaypDgQVChYv1pmQmPrZAnUzwTfHYE60Na/ADMByquO wDbBXMrZwOH+vHWlZWEDIWAaI5k3xb4rwS7wz2b0ufukUOMRV/c+BfLUDxk7BI2EdSaHNmxbL ZLTlAeBZ7fMAnO3jeCUymbl4beoBUmPVBBAlsUKrntrMLlEpDQebpcr3PysjKmedFvMqcHS0D 7fbyG28AS2Dib776ccVvL+YUg08r5m6jmgc8xX+6bInQLlszxB2WM1O0s9D76qgYzQlYwv0p9 6unosvmRr94R+AAKemSLYIHIslxKu6OEx/I9gjxnZos5M9L2ykeIIm6xkVC2kXYOJDRb/H7wr eZYTV5h8ntKQ4Dv1yN0Tb8FLmj4Vn/wXGZ8+LMNIcc7SWQE4CLH+SewSWon1+uubQxocfFWwO wHliTaamkMNtmjKl/JxhYZCONY3eWzH0wkgE5G/6jQxbKWyzTgoYXJLDA37VHYvZj85sqs1mA dKT3p+fR2DyIkzQ+W128n91chj2WsMY/P0s2+jjNU3lZ3j8edhuuq5Wm1lUVflS5DDEtrniLm kJhcRfaK+zoaP956OWQeYED0CTQQUBXTgiUb1JSCBWkrnP5YvJ4IPgP7Gr1vDN5+yln80XF7y wiyMzajTQici8r1dARUhYThT6Ydt0kSz1ZK6P75cmXaYyqfLWp3KKW3Px3oC1JEc1Uu5ZdZc X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:164749 Archived-At: > I see there is a hook already in vc: 'vc-post-command-functions'. > But it's unclear how to use it to call 'shrink-window-if-larger-than-buffer' > from the hook only on vc-log and vc-diff commands. > > Maybe vc-log-internal-common and vc-diff-internal could provide new hooks, > e.g. vc-log-post-command-functions and vc-diff-post-command-functions. What's the scope of a command? When it invokes an asynchonous process does it end when that process starts or when it finishes? Since I think that it's the former (how else could we then distiniguish "this" command from the "last" command), the idiom "post-command" appears inappropriate here. martin