From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58928: 29.0.50; overlays in org-mode are disrupted after call `org-capture` Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 17:12:37 +0100 Message-ID: <3219df16-041f-1685-8fd2-c0a4a5579efa@gmail.com> References: <87eduohyds.fsf@gmail.com> <834jvjdwwl.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfj3gmsx.fsf@gmail.com> <87bkprm4a9.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30414"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.1 Cc: Ihor Radchenko , 58928@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , Matt Armstrong , Eli Zaretskii , Eli Qian To: Eason Huang Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 03 17:13:17 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oqcqD-0007nk-7M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 17:13:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oqcq2-0007Ya-Ma; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 12:13:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oqcpz-0007YT-Mk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 12:13:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oqcpy-0007VI-QM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 12:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oqcpy-0000il-GC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 12:13:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2022 16:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 58928 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 58928-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B58928.16674919712747 (code B ref 58928); Thu, 03 Nov 2022 16:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 58928) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2022 16:12:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50097 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oqcpm-0000iF-Q4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 12:12:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-f50.google.com ([209.85.218.50]:33439) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oqcpi-0000hy-25 for 58928@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 12:12:49 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-f50.google.com with SMTP id q9so6743873ejd.0 for <58928@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 09:12:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Mwp6XNWsT29UYV4KezkTZgrkYcg3ks5c3OmJuc9+DQ0=; b=lHMc3TQaQXVR+LnwYE7DCpkdZARzqiFDjH0yV0VHcPFTKSuQ0R35GVRehWE/Mm/D1/ kiHoNhcE0YEK9RUN42xpfkD8IX+vY2IW8lpUM0GBU9qnV+wX1T2zMyEup4FGnLX7J4yx EFIdvAwXd9S5wgRNHsG/2QkQ/wlx7zTfDqnQcBShS78QqkU3F78CX25Pcbloh5EBme0S IvAv/MRVEghEglPD0x7Gi2hY80IS66ORWkgg2nuGuZ/JGE22t+o6b3znJ9kA8mOsvyv9 JA7RB713t0QyJWGWUeNcXBwfqZmYWOXIsNX/EV+HutXhGd3YZAvLy7HQGDmEbKDnIF83 oQsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Mwp6XNWsT29UYV4KezkTZgrkYcg3ks5c3OmJuc9+DQ0=; b=lIxxbHZc9hDJfEyhkcA1+nwfAxx2wd4ATAP3IwoUrwTswGaxuVYNpgsHgUnAhaz2cg i9GrY7ApxccJdBfqHvbGP/SzUGhFWytKiwW9LoK9vmYUOK8AGMb8nYaxRIpEAZgW2U3/ 0/4Wfaec8PRMKZch1WbNqAmnKrlse7Y498cPn5+QhYjmWTJ+UteGckln75vMC1Pjjkpd PO2dU1wt78HYeyOKnTHjO5eBs9u6bP/9DbdhFxMKPFvXtUy2HjJb/1DuDuMtRGJMvhN0 ObxskWe67/rn3REej7zCCISxur9dTZqZ9GMs8kVMQ6KmaWIt9tPkO68lTdybVmzS1Kcl qZiA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf20zH8qCO7XXqWwHgOHcj3+zkG5IdaUz3FYDwVut7i2g/+Reo4R R+EdsbD5dGVW++VtZkG1ucI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM57WlRxHKBuqfjohGNQkPtrwTDbIKrmUs2k2PcIjcWoom0w6qw7EPiwHe9LQfKWADSUBSuKQg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7e9e:b0:7ad:bc80:c003 with SMTP id qb30-20020a1709077e9e00b007adbc80c003mr26014083ejc.198.1667491959105; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 09:12:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.178.21] (pd9e36546.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.227.101.70]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p25-20020a056402501900b0046191f5e946sm699487eda.21.2022.11.03.09.12.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Nov 2022 09:12:38 -0700 (PDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:246984 Archived-At: On 03.11.22 16:45, Eason Huang wrote: > > Hi Gerd, > >> Gerd Möllmann writes: >> >> >> I do indeed see something like that, except that it is >> "** TODO test1...** TODO", i.e. the second TODO has the stars in front >> of it. > > I have same result as you. It was my typo for missing stars before > second TODO in the last email. Sorry! > >> Typing in the CAPTURE buffer shows the typed text in .notes after the >> second TODO, and the ellipsis doesn't move. > >> I guess the second TODO should be/was on a new line? > > I agree. The second TODO should be on a new line. Then it's probably something we didn't have yet. Maybe a off-by-one error somewhere.