* bug#5009: marked as done (complete-symbol should probably not be bound in global-map)
2009-11-22 0:22 ` bug#5009: complete-symbol should probably not be bound in global-map Lennart Borgman
2009-11-22 1:20 ` Drew Adams
@ 2009-12-05 22:05 ` Emacs bug Tracking System
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Emacs bug Tracking System @ 2009-12-05 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chong Yidong
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 916 bytes --]
Your message dated Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:03:06 -0500
with message-id <87ljhhjcyt.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
and subject line Re: bug#5009: complete-symbol should probably not be bound in global-map
has caused the Emacs bug report #5009,
regarding complete-symbol should probably not be bound in global-map
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
immediately.)
--
5009: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=5009
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com with problems
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2803 bytes --]
From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
To: Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
Subject: complete-symbol should probably not be bound in global-map
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:22:08 +0100
Message-ID: <e01d8a50911211622u3eeee5c3ob659d176f88b8ca8@mail.gmail.com>
But it is.
[-- Attachment #3: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2076 bytes --]
From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
To: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
Cc: 5009-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
Subject: Re: bug#5009: complete-symbol should probably not be bound in global-map
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:03:06 -0500
Message-ID: <87ljhhjcyt.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
> It fools people into believing there is a useful completion when there
> in fact is none. What use is for example symbol completion in
> css-mode, in php-mode etc?
>
> It is better to tell the truth. Bind it to there-is-no-completion-here
> (in a logic sense of course) in global map. Bind it to something
> useful in major modes.
I've just checked in a change that makes complete-symbol call
semantic-ia-complete-symbol if no tags table is loaded and Semantic is
enabled. We don't have a Semantic parser for css-mode and php-mode yet,
but hopefully we will in the future.
I'm closing this bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread