On Sun, 13 Feb 2022, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 14:18:41 +0000 (UTC) >> From: Van Ly >> cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, 53896@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> >> [1:text/plain Hide] >> >> On Sun, 13 Feb 2022, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >>>> >>>> ''' >>>> U+8072 kCantonese sing1 >>>> U+8072 kDefinition sound, voice, noise; tone; music >>>> U+8072 kHangul 성:0E >>>> U+8072 kHanyuPinlu shēng(2269) sheng(57) >>>> U+8072 kHanyuPinyin 42794.040:shēng >>>> U+8072 kJapaneseKun KOE >>>> U+8072 kJapaneseOn SEI SHOU >>>> U+8072 kKorean SENG >>>> U+8072 kMandarin shēng >>>> U+8072 kTang *shiɛng >>>> U+8072 kVietnamese thanh >>>> U+8072 kXHC1983 1023.021:shēng >>>> ''' >>> >>> I don't understand -- you suggest to use all of them? >>> >> >> I see in the *Help* buffer in response to describe-char a section >> >> ''' >> Unicode data: >> Name: >> Category: Letter, Other >> Combining class: 0 >> Bidi category: Left-to-Right >> ''' >> >> there could be a 'customize what to show' link that adjusts to >> include none, any or all of the lines for U+8072 in that section. > > We are mis-communicating. I thought you were talking about > completions on character names in "C-x 8 RET", and I thought you were > suggesting how to provide meaningful names to CJK Ideographs for that > completion. But for that, each character should have a single unique > name. > I think I wasn't clear in saying 聲 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH 8072 is meaningful to me, better than "no match". The tangent to Unihan_Reading.txt provides more meaning than the address scheme label "CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH" which to Po Lu is arbitrary and meaningless. For me, the label * LINEAR A SIGN * CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH puts meaning on the four digit hex value used in Unicode, as it is being typed * 8 * 80 * 807 * 8072 -- vl