From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#4743: fundamental mode not sufficiently fundamental yet Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:52:30 -0400 Message-ID: <2toc134781.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <4AD985C8.3020900@t-online.de> <4ADAF632.5080003@t-online.de> <4ADCAF7A.6000600@t-online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310237604 18489 80.91.229.12 (9 Jul 2011 18:53:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 18:53:24 +0000 (UTC) To: 4743-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 09 20:53:20 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfceW-0004Bo-7q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 20:53:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44563 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfceV-0007Kv-Iz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:53:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60484) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfceF-0007Jd-AO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:53:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfceE-0008Th-LC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:53:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52983) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfceE-0008TX-Jd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfceE-00013h-Cx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:53:02 -0400 Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 18:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 4743 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Mail-Followup-To: 4743@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 4743-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D4743.13102375594035 (code D ref 4743); Sat, 09 Jul 2011 18:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 4743-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2011 18:52:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfcdq-000132-JZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:52:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfcdo-00012m-Lc for 4743-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:52:36 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54984) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qfcdi-0006rF-Vr; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:52:31 -0400 X-Spook: cypherpunk target NORAD benelux ANDVT security South X-Ran: y7T9:/m+RoT(Lh (Andreas Schwab's message of "Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:11:08 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:53:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:48357 Archived-At: I don't see a need to keep open this particular report, which was marked "wontfix" some time ago. Andreas Schwab wrote: > "Fundamental" just means "using all global, default values". It does > not necessarily mean "no bells and whistles".