bug#45844: 27.1; unwanted raising of other frame when emacs is in the backgound and switch-to-buffer is used in a dedicated frame

[martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>]

 > I'll try that, I only found it strange that if a background timer uses
 > switch-to-buffer

Timers should never use `switch-to-buffer'.  If they want to draw
attention to the object they want to display, they should use
`pop-to-buffer'.  Otherwise, `display-buffer' is the function to be
preferred although if that needs a new frame, it will raise that frame
too unless your WM prevents it.

'switch-to-buffer' is a user command and should not be called by any
Lisp code.  Unfortunately, it's done a hundred times in the Emacs code
base and there's nothing we can reasonably do about that.

 > and the frame is in in the background then why the frame
 > is raised. If it's not triggered by a user interaction then there is
 > no practical reason to bring the frame into the foreground, because the
 > user is using an other app, so he doesn't want to type into that frame
 > at that point. The frame should only switch to the buffer and remain in the
 > background, so when the user get backs to emacs then he can see the result
 > of the background process presented to him.
 >
 > It sounds like a bug to me, but I accept if you say it's hard to implement
 > for some reason and I'll change my code to use an other method.

It's by no means hard to implement (preventing a new frame from getting
raised is much harder).  But we cannot change the semantics of
`switch-to-buffer' in this regard.  As long as window managers permit us
to do that, it will raise the frame it uses and give it focus.

martin