From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23425: master branch: `message' wrongly corrupts ' to curly quote. Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 16:31:31 -0400 Message-ID: <2f1sqsucm4.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <20170603205331.GA2130@acm.fritz.box> <20170605162737.GA30946@acm.fritz.box> <20170605203753.GB30946@acm.fritz.box> <20170607191344.GB2430@acm.fritz.box> <20170608173400.GA2662@acm.fritz.box> <20170609194141.GA3410@acm.fritz.box> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1497040332 12000 195.159.176.226 (9 Jun 2017 20:32:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 20:32:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) Cc: Paul Eggert , 23425@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 09 22:32:07 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dJQZi-0002a3-Fg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 22:32:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56301 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dJQZk-0006p9-G0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 16:32:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41902) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dJQZf-0006p0-1k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 16:32:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dJQZe-0004Ii-DZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 16:32:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34779) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dJQZe-0004Ie-AZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 16:32:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dJQZe-0000PG-55 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 16:32:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20160502145517.GA5357@acm.fritz.box> Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 20:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23425 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23425-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23425.14970403061538 (code B ref 23425); Fri, 09 Jun 2017 20:32:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23425) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2017 20:31:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37455 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dJQZO-0000Ok-Do for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 16:31:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50838) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dJQZM-0000OY-BF for 23425@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 16:31:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dJQZG-0004DZ-91 for 23425@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 16:31:39 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:60608) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dJQZA-0004CP-HP; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 16:31:32 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dJQZ9-0005Tr-W3; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 16:31:32 -0400 X-Spook: Emergency Landing Toxic BART Emergency Broadcast System X-Ran: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:133420 Archived-At: Alan Mackenzie wrote: > I think the topic has been pretty thoroughly discussed. Are there any > objections remaining to me implementing this change and committing it to > master? I object. This is a contentious issue, and I would like the maintainers to make an explicit decision before you change anything.