From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#67993: Selecting buffer automatically Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 11:39:10 +0100 Message-ID: <2edb97dc-bbf6-4020-b4ae-8188082c80c6@gmx.at> References: <86zfy0g641.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <865y09nmp0.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <4659812e-c023-492a-b810-d9d3cada1ade@gmx.at> <861qauxswd.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86cyudjdmb.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <1ea06837-0d7e-46ba-849c-a4bf42929c40@gmx.at> <86frz6o832.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <942ced7b-53f8-4b33-9280-6cdba4b6ed6b@gmx.at> <867ckhqgqp.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86y1cvkpm3.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Reply-To: martin rudalics Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8613"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: 67993@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 13 11:40:28 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rObRC-0001zR-K4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 11:40:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rObQw-0004cl-LT; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 05:40:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rObQq-0004cI-MI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 05:40:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rObQq-00086u-5h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 05:40:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rObQo-0003jJ-GG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 05:40:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 10:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67993 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 67993-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B67993.170514235814277 (code B ref 67993); Sat, 13 Jan 2024 10:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 67993) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2024 10:39:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38503 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rObQ5-0003iD-Ru for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 05:39:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:49621) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rObQ3-0003hz-OV for 67993@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 05:39:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.at; s=s31663417; t=1705142351; x=1705747151; i=rudalics@gmx.at; bh=7Y/GW/VPWz77Azn2C+HLzTHQmoIAD7jZBduCbuB8TdQ=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To; b=RIVcX0G5Xp6h9bkAOgBYmSZu1vgNGgfqmGPx7/zW/P7ZlliynVt1LOcixY8MiYBm T4ZF9w+qZXGgWKQ/GcBg4RMDiQtlA2/nKy55I4VwdVfYYrhTrS3BmTwiIjwQpZ/Xp 0WvQDy6zNpmR3FPgvzekZupVfD+4CeVqsz0oDGitA/86N6o8mGXP8BdZPsmYTY4ZH Ozh0+GE1ovW3XRG3urKgbwK2t78zLzit+TujC18mNCBnSdte+HS+5DRkbgt3WsgwW M8MAc3UWNk9vAg1hTDigmCgMrp1E8MvrBvOCoQN18Z+r6oOLrKXEVznjx4VbUIyr/ iA7kZef0J+8IbGm8IA== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Original-Received: from [192.168.31.113] ([212.95.5.124]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MC34X-1rJLAB3YBJ-00CRYh; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 11:39:10 +0100 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <86y1cvkpm3.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:/1BhuNB0dFsE/Alav1jNQyVJF/Ppp8z0vQ25mmO706A7eijtrO/ j3kf2+Lr80fRiUCNcfmYJL6aMurvhXxHDozfkzDE6fgU+h6TmYrc0bzx4Jnb3OPBvYtv0SN mb73fqEMHJ95yhT9qsDFkJTl7dDhB1UMuIhiDf9nzGVP9QhGwjvAQoRRc+2EeNxsGKGXnLN KVj1ry1CoZFntD6BLnehQ== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:e8K1bGk3New=;S0RdDSqh0hawHcvuz1RvAr7ZEpP 5oc8at8pxLzuc6p0b8wHjQLn+xgT6nB8ClbdCT0JjksMoB42dx6El+dnCHKyTDLt3xHB4ibVd OfCQWrunCgMsL/XfAo7fMOhp3rjosrkXIvczw84QC0HZ8VblNTYiQ+kjmjgCc1Rvbet+vEPPK d/qWcsdOYVNx/P+vwqIoovwvBn8rZAKY3Gp1IXh13d9wBX/JspTqGJWTxWE+bJxIby2EhHCTa PK5sWu07aIGsrKPArWK2Fk34BuwhRlscyh3sD1xhODR/dxbTAMU/qgIaQjn+oHK/VOAQm6WyN /bs3P9nDPjtt+CBSJX00OZdiIBRm5bHjjZ8U6CyqKnWf2f8DnaLyu332Gah/AnGDar0TRAqpN Q9IjFIKJ3xo5mgTHvBqDNtwhziTgcowEVuh3idUfDV66YlJrH9jJJQw+2KndFL3OI5KfyLHWx TZ8/QyENs8c/+Ff8rwyWSnIyVJqfTyoMUsGVMmxYzqY3w4eBGTeqR74GuzoFW0jEQ+j9FmjtW By3YrgLcRI8JCRfAWs6RWTmR8nYNrkaxM476zBziAJvfOcvs2Wdg4rd0SXh2Vx64FZrdw4FqA x7pl7Iov9LPDZQdzwtKk19/YOvWEl0FliONyutKST4fq4djCuezJpL6VceEonnZMasgG1AizZ V/m1+DLzEq09xp58Xyvc70KoLRELIw3PLN6+pzqjbGBqDvvs07hPvMAwTdf99lJJVMpUtocXd f4o/gQ7Sfl14wKAe3+qxo6Y/ABWo4U9VMVaE5AmsvZx6gDzl9QdY/Jq66PKaUsJZCCcp7eDY X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:278117 Archived-At: > But actually the customization for "1" doesn't affect popping to "2" > because pop-to-buffer still selects windows and creates such layout: > > *scratch* > Buffer "1" > Buffer "2" > > Only post-command-hook selects the original window afterwards > instead of leaving the buffer "2" selected. And if the customization for "2" meant to select the window, the final outcome will depend on whichever (de-)selection comes last in the 'post-command-hook'. You should at least document that in the manual. It looks pretty fragile to me. martin