From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9384: psychoanalyze-pinhead Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:01:25 -0400 Message-ID: <2e1uvm52ey.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <1314402573.3073.1.camel@lambertdw> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315767715 23827 80.91.229.12 (11 Sep 2011 19:01:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:01:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9384@debbugs.gnu.org, David Ward Lambert To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 11 21:01:51 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2pHq-0000d1-2x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:01:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34384 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2pHp-0005Wc-Aa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:01:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53691) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2pHm-0005WW-Rv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:01:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2pHl-0001Jv-UV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:01:46 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60620) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2pHl-0001Jn-Su for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:01:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2pLu-000234-9A; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:06:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9384 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9384-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9384.13157679487854 (code B ref 9384); Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9384) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2011 19:05:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2pLd-00022Z-9f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:05:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2pLb-00022P-2A for 9384@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:05:44 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2pHR-0002Vh-CH; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:01:25 -0400 X-Spook: CipherTAC-2000 CNCIS broadside passwd munitions codes X-Ran: GAVc>nyfp_EUHUn&-d6.^_esz:b0vU<{"-)j7BpSi.\X#:hgv#/g8B?tbV@s (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 11 Sep 2011 04:21:49 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:06:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:50968 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variable doctor-sent) Me too. > In any case, shouldn't the command give a warning if it can't find the > Zippy database? Probably. Both of these are separate issues from the one in the original report though (which isn't a bug IMO).