From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8865: 24.0.50; `display-buffer' does not respect `pop-up-frames' Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:13:29 -0700 Message-ID: <2A0043B8080E430AA8D8DE4C4FBC323E@us.oracle.com> References: <4DF7B1BB.6050704@gmx.at><4DF87A4F.60704@gmx.at><5F95025D0ABE4561A305F30293828F38@us.oracle.com><4DF8DD1E.8080004@gmx.at><68E985ED37824BE799A9C01162553E22@us.oracle.com><4DF8EF87.8080903@gmx.at><7923A876A42744A39EEC6AAB67362EAC@us.oracle.com><4DF9FEA7.1050509@gmx.at><4DFA1C6B.50400@gmx.at><4DFB76D4.6080400@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308514623 19982 80.91.229.12 (19 Jun 2011 20:17:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 20:17:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8865@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'martin rudalics'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 19 22:16:59 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QYOQS-0002IG-Md for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:16:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47615 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QYOQR-0005Pa-RX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:16:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43777) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QYONh-0004nd-FZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:14:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QYONf-0001ZF-J7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:14:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48349) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QYONf-0001Z7-AM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:14:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QYONe-0003ux-Ev; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 20:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8865 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8865-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8865.130851442315028 (code B ref 8865); Sun, 19 Jun 2011 20:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8865) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jun 2011 20:13:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QYONL-0003uL-Dr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:13:43 -0400 Original-Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QYONJ-0003u7-OB for 8865@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:13:42 -0400 Original-Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by rcsinet10.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.2) with ESMTP id p5JKDXo7029648 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 19 Jun 2011 20:13:35 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt357.oracle.com (acsmt357.oracle.com [141.146.40.157]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5JKDX4Q009338 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 19 Jun 2011 20:13:33 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt008.oracle.com (abhmt008.oracle.com [141.146.116.17]) by acsmt357.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p5JKDRsY028057; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:13:28 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.51.106) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:13:26 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcwtBb+hm3rqHdfyT4iILC3VsUBEIAAALHrAAGhJJnAABWbp0A== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090206.4DFE586F.00FC:SCFMA922111,ss=1,re=-4.000,fgs=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:14:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:47331 Archived-At: However, I would still appreciate some guidance wrt replacing current (pre Emacs 24) tests of `pop-up-frames' and, more generally, the use of `display-buffer-alist' (both as a user and wrt code that would test its value). IOW, there are open questions about `display-buffer-alist' raised in this bug thread. Even as some of these bugs introduced by your changes get fixed, so that the new Emacs code becomes more correctly backward-compatible wrt `pop-up-frames', the goal is to move away from `pop-up-frames'. So that is where more guidance would be helpful, for both users and elisp programmers.