From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35702: xref revert-buffer Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 18:47:57 +0300 Message-ID: <28666899-1fcd-947b-8b2d-528f786302a9@yandex.ru> References: <87tvdzv4m2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <838suw5jvh.fsf@gnu.org> <835zq059az.fsf@gnu.org> <710f0ac1-80d7-6db8-7653-c58f93b6f4ab@yandex.ru> <831s0o54g7.fsf@gnu.org> <9869e4ac-1b36-b605-22a8-b8bab4910132@yandex.ru> <83r28n4pdn.fsf@gnu.org> <2103dba2-60ec-9752-1ab8-71ed66fafe63@yandex.ru> <83h89j3rus.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="99686"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 Cc: 35702@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 25 18:05:28 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hUZAl-000PnR-Bx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 18:05:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43988 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hUZAk-0003me-2x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 12:05:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40396) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hUZAb-0003JF-OO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 12:05:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hUYus-0006Pl-3K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 11:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35864) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hUYur-0006Pa-Vh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 11:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hUYur-0008Va-S0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 11:49:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 15:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35702 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35702-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35702.155879929032630 (code B ref 35702); Sat, 25 May 2019 15:49:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35702) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 May 2019 15:48:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49408 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hUYu2-0008UC-5N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 11:48:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f54.google.com ([209.85.128.54]:38073) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hUYu0-0008Ty-LF for 35702@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2019 11:48:09 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f54.google.com with SMTP id t5so11880217wmh.3 for <35702@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 25 May 2019 08:48:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=89r8h4IkwnyeXhDCz/DdrKdmHF21cXlbdo5uYwtznVg=; b=sapT7HlMeJEGlw0H86HORuA5JWO6+JVyO7FDNsvF++MnLkH2FBdKbsyKIV/v3JFo31 2Vd1ZkTnsqCUgk54NXVZLGa8kKgD9oNSx+vsC4jTzUxTNgLUjYp6oXwPKDMIQkbLl6DR IhNf1wNOgtju0MYPqzdvX5Iz+gK8bE1p70o1NjFpHW/psBDvspr2n/guzyX9eaQbkND8 6ee5arqy/MtgUu09Wzamd3+NZvSwVL1Cl2YUm76j/09vwhomnffuruvoLR7GeYX0yqHr 5Uo6OvWIU1eGL6oC7a2rsuOg7hKOUgzd4YDRa99QGT93/XZzK/kaBZLM0M3SPOpmoqWL pvmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=89r8h4IkwnyeXhDCz/DdrKdmHF21cXlbdo5uYwtznVg=; b=WWaoUrV/DPqWem+/jAomel6mthfDbyh8M5BzZxyUwqIiQSZ7ypwXDCJKLU8cI8FCYf WOllCmAsNYlOEMLFJvEjx4B9GrbiG2Seb3xeTtzguV3/ZkDaF1grp14FX56Ev6XTG3HJ RAYIFo5NVOGtzoCVNNmXOv4Wu/f6GP05a9ah+vdiKb7xJ/OpQnggsh9/MunEMXkc49Sc RTHoEWC5KWwIGJ7vxE5+Skeb2L+2WvVeuDqiAHTmADD6f08hmE3POQVuU6+53vu9WbQ8 tlPTnKPP9+ySI6VDW9OvQdZKlSNqgpd4XMzFt22M8EjhJpaJv2mcmMI16F6FyLCZ1+ZZ RKeg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWHLd0VjfGXY4/jc0RA9C527wdjck3p6p2vAXXAqwLyQIL0IyzZ LkroJ0055Q89AARnkL1wlVQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzSKdLdxGAo13NkDwxH6WDKCTTqHGEruw074uxzSux7OEhPVrpWviYYUEQ+qC4C1HXs7pxu7Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:230a:: with SMTP id 10mr19480910wmo.13.1558799282654; Sat, 25 May 2019 08:48:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.174.23]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z5sm9347567wmi.34.2019.05.25.08.48.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 25 May 2019 08:48:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83h89j3rus.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:159763 Archived-At: On 25.05.2019 10:39, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I'm fine with coming up with some classification of these commands. > But I think the classification should be in the manual, not in NEWS. If you have any suggestions for better docstrings for there variables, I'd like to know. >> Would you be surprised to hear that I don't even know where to begin? > Yes. Well, it's true. I don't know where the comments will work better for the recent additions than just reading the code. Do you have any particular questions?