Is this patch okay? Please feel free to make any changes you see fit.
Thank you.

Vincenzo

In data luned́ 6 marzo 2023 07:12:49 CET, Theodor Thornhill ha scritto:
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> From: Vincenzo Pupillo <v.pupillo@gmail.com>
> >> Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2023 14:50:39 +0100
> >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, 61913@debbugs.gnu.org
> >> 
> >> nvim-treesiter seems to use a "lockfile" in which they put the version of the language parser to be installed
> >> (https://github.com/nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter/blob/master/lockfile.json) to allow some stability I suppose.
> >
> > Those seem to be Git SHA hashes, but how can Emacs verify that the
> > particular grammar shared library is of that revision or later?  We
> > can only tell users to verify that, which is not very reliable, and
> > requires users to clone the repository.
> 
> We could keep a header in the *-ts-mode.el file maybe?  Something like:
> 
> 
> ;;; Grammar version: 95e84b5493e8d21060f1a905d2e5e3c5590bae45
> 
> 
> Anyway, I think until we have such a system in place, we should strive
> to adhere to the most recent version of the grammar.  The diff is ok,
> Vicenzo.  Would you like to add a proper patch or should I just do it?
> I mean with a commit message and format like in CONTRIBUTE?
> 
> Theo
>