From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 14:49:19 -0400 Message-ID: <27ljouutzk.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87r63gzcap.fsf@jurta.org> <87aba3qb5g.fsf@jurta.org> <4965AE6B.6070802@gmx.at> <87fxjtmo4z.fsf@jurta.org> <49671922.4080609@gmx.at> <87zlhubw10.fsf@jurta.org> <496DF4B9.3080805@gmx.at> <496E5F58.7030304@gmx.at> <496F11C0.4080700@gmx.at> <87ocy8fajt.fsf@jurta.org> <4975F4D5.5030000@gmx.at> <87y6tk1j47.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <49F7FE14.8010107@gmx.at> <49FFE515.4020608@gmx.at> <87vdnzpks0.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4A11184F.4030606@gmx.at> Reply-To: Glenn Morris , 1806@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1242673939 30705 80.91.229.12 (18 May 2009 19:12:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1806@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 18 21:12:12 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M68Fv-0007Ki-HN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 21:12:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56124 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M68Fu-00013P-Jd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 15:12:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M68Fp-00010z-SA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 15:12:05 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M68Fk-0000vw-MH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 15:12:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49950 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M68Fk-0000vp-Bh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 15:12:00 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:48173) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M68Fj-00016u-Dd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 15:11:59 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n4IJBuUn025516; Mon, 18 May 2009 12:11:57 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n4IIt5DG019451; Mon, 18 May 2009 11:55:05 -0700 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Glenn Morris Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 18:55:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 1806 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1806-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1806.124267256618027 (code B ref 1806); Mon, 18 May 2009 18:55:05 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1806) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 18 May 2009 18:49:26 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n4IInLfu018020 for <1806@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 18 May 2009 11:49:22 -0700 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1M67tn-00083c-JF; Mon, 18 May 2009 14:49:19 -0400 X-Spook: Gazprom Commecen AFSPC government warfare COSCO Albanian X-Ran: .yc"Q{eR0^gQ2Z(|kB2Y>;icD559>{r[p0Ag@ao%hA~DNc;">0z>yEF~b,y!oj%7}"?5?% X-Hue: yellow X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <4A11184F.4030606@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Mon, 18 May 2009 10:11:59 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 15:12:04 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:27983 Archived-At: martin rudalics wrote: > I suppose you mean the call in `calendar-basic-setup' here. In this > case you probably want to split the largest or LRU window vertically > even if your customized settings would imply a horizontal split. But > you don't insist on splitting the selected window. Right? > > Any opinions, Glenn? Hi; I haven't been following this, but after a quick skim of the (long) thread, I think neither the current nor the proposed behaviour is ideal (it seems to be a choice between getting the height wrong or the width wrong), but I prefer the current one. I'd rather leave it as is for now, and look to improve it after 23.1. Thanks.