From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58984: 29.0.50; M-x compile misinterprets libcheck error message format Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 12:14:11 +0100 Message-ID: <27B55D53-4549-4807-94AD-926A280FBBF5@acm.org> References: <87a6589of4.fsf@tcd.ie> <87edui3ax7.fsf@tcd.ie> <87zgd4uvu7.fsf@tcd.ie> <6252DE05-F84F-4A81-BD06-3F4CF7AFCD08@acm.org> <87wn858fu6.fsf@tcd.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33769"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 58984@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 09 12:15:41 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1osj3U-0008eL-OJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 12:15:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1osj35-0003Ci-HN; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 06:15:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1osj2s-0003B9-Td for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 06:15:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1osj2s-00030y-Kr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 06:15:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1osj2s-0003ZH-C1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 06:15:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 11:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 58984 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 58984-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B58984.166799246413654 (code B ref 58984); Wed, 09 Nov 2022 11:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 58984) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Nov 2022 11:14:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39157 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1osj2G-0003Y9-Fy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 06:14:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mail1479c50.megamailservers.eu ([91.136.14.79]:48404 helo=mail118c50.megamailservers.eu) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1osj2D-0003Xu-5m for 58984@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 06:14:22 -0500 X-Authenticated-User: mattiase@bredband.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu; s=maildub; t=1667992454; bh=2m/mjtInIgFogvD21KOXQVO5eTBkeJu/HXi7wdQsF6o=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=Njg1RiXzekxTFLH+OXiPPI1CkeBWlE+bPUCCX9sbuMngJANAxs19wptjjF8tZ/Ja2 ZlmAwVjYevHFqFFhH15ZMgHsWKMG0jlI3rZEAelKbLtJnZ7IPCN9jb1/WSdueZIYMe 432SJLZVmaW9ytp3EEiYfbktvZSHGU+4vUhUhPA8= Feedback-ID: mattiase@acm.or Original-Received: from smtpclient.apple (c188-150-171-209.bredband.tele2.se [188.150.171.209]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail118c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 2A9BECL8048373; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 11:14:13 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87wn858fu6.fsf@tcd.ie> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A782F20.636B8B86.001F, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-Origin-Country: SE X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:247397 Archived-At: 8 nov. 2022 kl. 19.24 skrev Basil L. Contovounesios : > I'd have to look at the source and search their past discussions; it's > possible this has come up before. Don't hold your breath though, > because I won't get around to this soon. Either way I wouldn't be > particularly comfortable asking to change a default format that's > presumably been around for a while, but perhaps they can advise us > indeed. Yes, we usually prefer working with upstream tool developers whenever = possible, rather than adapting to yet another quirky message format. Let's not assume their format is that way by design; it could just be a = simple oversight. > Does it have to go in the 'gnu' rule? Is it not feasible to have it = as > a separate rule? That's a good point and it clearly can be a separate rule, but should = that rule be added to the way-too-long list of patterns in Emacs or = something that libcheck users need to add? Or should we include it but = disabled by default? (And would the new rule have to cope with spaces and colons in file = names, duplicating most of the messiness of the gnu rule?) Each time another rule is added to compilation-error-regexp-alist-alist = I hold my breath, watching the now slightly taller tower sway = uneasily... An alternative is to post-process the output of the command that emits = these messages -- a simple sed command might do.