Noam Postavsky <npostavs@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Mike Kupfer <mkupfer@alum.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> >
> >> I thought we had switched to just supporting the current Emacs
> >> version, rather than doing a separate MH-E release that supports
> >> multiple Emacs versions.
> >
> > Yes, I've confirmed with Bill Wohler that that's what we're doing.
> >
> > I'm happy for either you or Glenn to push those patches, but I can do it
> > if you prefer (probably next week sometime).
> >
> > Oh, and to close the loop with some suggestions that Glenn made back in
> > February (e.g., use cl-lib instead of cl)...  I do plan to look into
> > those suggestions, but I don't know how long it will take me.  So fixing
> > the immediate cl problem now seems to me like a good thing.
> 
> That all sounds fine, push at your convenience, there's no special urgency.

I tested what I think we have so far (appended) and haven't noticed
anything amiss. Please push what you have at your convenience, as I
don't think I see it on master yet.

I tried to add eval-and-compile to mailabbrev, but got the following
compilation error:

    mh-e/mh-compat.el:263:1:Error: Symbol’s function definition is void: mh-require

-- 
Bill Wohler <wohler@newt.com> aka <Bill.Wohler@nasa.gov>
http://www.newt.com/wohler/
GnuPG ID:610BD9AD