From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jan D." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16676: 24.3.50; Repeated but random hang Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 17:40:21 +0100 Message-ID: <26DA7E1C-7874-41A1-B1CE-8E500EEA22CF@swipnet.se> References: <8738jv68vr.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83txcbxtg7.fsf@gnu.org> <87r47ecsy7.fsf@building.gnus.org> <834n4axa58.fsf@gnu.org> <8761opvr61.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83lhxlx47c.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391877672 28892 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2014 16:41:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 16:41:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , "16676@debbugs.gnu.org" <16676@debbugs.gnu.org> To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 08 17:41:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WCAxy-0000B6-4e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 17:41:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47227 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCAxx-0008C3-GU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:41:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53571) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCAxp-0008AJ-1q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:41:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCAxj-0006nh-AD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:41:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44049) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCAxj-0006nd-6e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:41:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCAxi-0002Fo-JE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:41:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Jan D." Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 16:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16676 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16676-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16676.13918776378626 (code B ref 16676); Sat, 08 Feb 2014 16:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16676) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2014 16:40:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58068 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCAxF-0002Ey-Q7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:40:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailfe04.swip.net ([212.247.154.97]:45998 helo=swip.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCAx9-0002Ei-94 for 16676@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:40:32 -0500 X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE Original-Received: from hosdjarv.se (account mj138573@tele2.se [46.59.42.57] verified) by mailfe04.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPA id 473972005; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 17:40:21 +0100 X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11B554a) In-Reply-To: <83lhxlx47c.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84969 Archived-At: Hi. 8 feb 2014 kl. 11:56 skrev Eli Zaretskii : >> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen >> Cc: 16676@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 02:23:50 -0800 >>=20 >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >>=20 >>> Xlib obviously thinks otherwise, the error message in the backtrace is >>> very clear. >>=20 >> Well, might not something have scribbled something somewhere to make X >> believe the window is no longer viable? >=20 > I'm not an expert on this, so I don't know. Jan, can you comment, > please? The io error handler is only called for fatal errors. Any system call relat= ed to io in Xlib that fails triggers a call to the error handler. Xlib can not recover from this, so th= e connection is lost. If something writes garbage into Xlibs data, anything can happen. Jan D.=20=