From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#52666: 27.0.50; Unexpected mode line flickering when creating frames Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 15:46:05 +0100 Message-ID: <258f5841-1b0c-f844-1b46-c8224190635c@gmx.at> References: <837dbz2twl.fsf@gnu.org> <84953d3c-e328-6221-3747-f7cfc69d89f6@gmx.at> <87wnjz6spx.fsf@metalevel.at> <058d7891-a08a-2ba8-e3c1-9a29ff3c8092@gmx.at> <87y24fdspi.fsf@metalevel.at> <6faae86d-b1ef-57b4-e5d8-298c7777be24@gmx.at> <87o859vgas.fsf@metalevel.at> <1557a1b7-f634-3add-5dde-6326b0b74328@gmx.at> <87wnjwr456.fsf@metalevel.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8597"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 52666@debbugs.gnu.org To: Markus Triska Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 23 15:47:26 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n0PNO-00024P-7a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 15:47:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44732 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0PNN-0006wa-0I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 09:47:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54842) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0PN3-0006ut-RY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 09:47:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49219) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0PN0-00062a-GS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 09:47:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n0PN0-0002sR-El for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 09:47:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 14:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52666 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 52666-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52666.164027077811009 (code B ref 52666); Thu, 23 Dec 2021 14:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 52666) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2021 14:46:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60765 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n0PMI-0002rU-4n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 09:46:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:54753) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n0PME-0002rF-6p for 52666@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 09:46:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1640270767; bh=kZJMM2au1umbtAx+VjWH1DlxtaYd9EWs4SZmmJjIwXc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=OCsJ54LkwAoGsurAv+NbWC3Wi5QHO0l0tUOPOlu9siA9IPzYEu++2oF1GomcLN2FF RaSzWnNIHG64CQ6ZUItHb8k87Y3ZNDkc/69QpSJgEFe/hL6pUxpYV/gtotyOQFfr7t z1V8BwqcqdjXnytcrjz/CzpcADW/R7hUMnnqwd9A= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.103] ([213.142.96.225]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M4s4r-1n08N604rX-0022tO; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 15:46:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87wnjwr456.fsf@metalevel.at> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:oMZZuU+aHC1GIetbyhCjH1KWSh0y+AlZjlFQIQyvF3BoCPLyTYw 6nDU2+3zYliXsl4i09NsnOnkwlXHNsy07LVgxaXjPMprG7iQgU6Cxej/k4AH5oukWZScuIG I9lFQ7lfWNrXNody+oiy78YHEbM4fHwvmnXvsV0o15WKPvByudSL4mYJeTfugBLuxn2ed89 tAuepyDqgM+68rUkYdB1g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:amlmxB2MQwo=:KGEzCF/127+YrtY8OaYp+h 1ihDKiiCnuWGjOLxBdS6pc0BnnCG0i2KOM7bAjxN8v10wjxMW468mnwhgHBe6SI4KecQibwOm 1CEJWT0V009GkvcEpII+RiF7RVFd6ZvBFohZCjqciBBfIhLoiSCArP90ixUVN3QcHkiNzsnj/ hGYowsCoFjiKG8eKzd+cQOLl4zxMRJJD55BOEt3OJ4gZ9chlinvYvSEyXqN5dH9cpC9PizD7/ qf67+OzaDc63q9VYaBSC6aQJN1T/6cmhRj/4+LYTaGXe96pqD0wjy4WSvO8wSWJpoHUUlCsgN ENFxxm2YxWdLCAloD3K9F2KbW3ZbvAQ0ADOqCWDJkMiPXZO3w0vWEiGRPGM+3bM/0rFHT3/iF CK8Z/b3WyPv1LYCIL/uXQL9UDi+C2kp6jEq/QyqPuWStfM+AT0Y4hw5Y21zbDiHuDVeU9jdGJ 8Md0vbaQpW5T8pCWYT+ttney4EFWv41HkgI+O4+dhgUWdGxF+6K6QA1zSuL07X1mpzSEYbfN/ cwLkMFJFghhY0jD9NqNAIFoK4ILXNYHGbM2EoSyEIBNjLdNku/XWVElRD8NPAgNLMQ+BDhNeL 0kHAcrXvASd4zzD8EoKTrC/OCKu/HJmhS/soclrDu1ot2/4HzLv9YZXRI5MFdrWbA0Y0WchR/ qMpORVGweaMmF5if/suAAUSjs5LluFTH/+gXIzL4Z125NroD224y+YJ4uwk3gg4Puee3zYVc7 kttR9dVHC6Y+qdLMNqqkQgVZZ7MhbY7pz7oEsIEpfTHyBKNllytjhU8+IhMJAxxpSCBVhxAv X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:222983 Archived-At: > For my specific use case, this behaviour is ideal: I would like to show > information in a new frame, but not select the frame. I am surprised to > hear that in your configuration, the new frame is indeed selected. Do > you accordingly get t as the result of evaluating the above form? No. I'm getting nil here too. And apparently the child frame gets selected if and only if I click into it. If all issues have been resolved, please close this bug. Thanks, martin