From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mike Kupfer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22043: 25.0.50; search-forward and char folding Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 20:53:02 -0800 Message-ID: <25185.1448859182@allegro.localdomain> References: <15605.1448748702@allegro.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448859261 912 80.91.229.3 (30 Nov 2015 04:54:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 04:54:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22043@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 30 05:54:07 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a3GTW-0005UO-8s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 05:54:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38927 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3GTZ-0003fk-Pk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 23:54:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37081) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3GTW-0003eI-9m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 23:54:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3GTS-0004iV-8K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 23:54:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42041) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3GTS-0004iR-50 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 23:54:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a3GTS-0001Xe-0s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 23:54:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mike Kupfer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 04:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22043 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22043-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22043.14488591895863 (code B ref 22043); Mon, 30 Nov 2015 04:54:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22043) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2015 04:53:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59982 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a3GSb-0001WV-7U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 23:53:09 -0500 Original-Received: from shell1.rawbw.com ([198.144.192.42]:34379) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a3GSY-0001WL-4X for 22043@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 23:53:07 -0500 Original-Received: from allegro.localdomain (m208-249.dsl.rawbw.com [198.144.208.249]) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTP id tAU4r27X063807; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 20:53:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.kupfer@acm.org) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host m208-249.dsl.rawbw.com [198.144.208.249] claimed to be allegro.localdomain In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 29 Nov 2015 12:41:16 -0800." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+mdk01; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.2 Content-ID: <25184.1448859182.1@allegro.localdomain> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109434 Archived-At: Drew Adams wrote: > Perhaps, to be more precise, the difference is search that > does or does not accept general regexp patterns as _input_. > Those that do have "regexp" (or "-re-"?) in their name; > those that do not do not have it. The former do not > support char folding; the latter do. Is that correct (and > complete)? I'm afraid it's more complicated than that. If nothing else, there's the "word" family of search functions, which don't do character folding. regards, mike