From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ulrich Mueller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#30793: 25.3; menubar font broken with fontconfig-2.13.0 (with Lucid toolkit) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 22:04:21 +0100 Message-ID: <23208.15573.298674.813306@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <23207.44429.407369.177062@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <83y3ivrk3s.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1520974994 21061 195.159.176.226 (13 Mar 2018 21:03:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 21:03:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 30793@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 13 22:03:10 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1evr4f-0005IJ-U7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 22:03:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42827 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1evr6g-0007Gs-V7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 17:05:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60961) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1evr6Z-0007GD-VE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 17:05:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1evr6V-0001OZ-1D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 17:05:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52075) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1evr6U-0001ON-UY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 17:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1evr6U-0005J2-El for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 17:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ulrich Mueller Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 21:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30793 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 30793-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30793.152097508320362 (code B ref 30793); Tue, 13 Mar 2018 21:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30793) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Mar 2018 21:04:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59972 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1evr6A-0005IM-PW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 17:04:42 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([140.211.166.183]:56424) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1evr69-0005I8-JX for 30793@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 17:04:41 -0400 Original-Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (host2092.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ulm) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E3FD335C2C; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 21:04:34 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83y3ivrk3s.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:144214 Archived-At: >>>>> On Tue, 13 Mar 2018, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Isn't this entirely between X and fontconfig? I mean, what's Emacs's > part in this? Indeed, it is entirely a fontconfig problem: > $ fc-match 'Droid Sans-10:bold' # with fontconfig-2.12.6 > DroidSans-Bold.ttf: "Droid Sans" "Bold" > $ fc-match 'Droid Sans-10:bold' # with fontconfig-2.13.0 > DroidSans.ttf: "Droid Sans" "Regular" > Was this reported to the fontconfig developers? It was: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105415 Sorry for the noise.