From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51883: 29.0.50; Command to get accidentally deleted frames back Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 11:53:10 +0000 Message-ID: <227d35a5bcbeda91dd8b@heytings.org> References: <87czn1gfb1.fsf@web.de> <838rxo0zk7.fsf@gnu.org> <83tugbyliv.fsf@gnu.org> <1adc044f473776dc3748@heytings.org> <83v90ouyp7.fsf@gnu.org> <664b6d0147a183b153f7@heytings.org> <87tufxg78p.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33878"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 51883@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 27 12:54:20 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mqwHb-0008cL-Mw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 12:54:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42622 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqwHa-0004Z7-46 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 06:54:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34336) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqwHL-0004Yr-Ds for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 06:54:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49772) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqwHK-00016y-Az for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 06:54:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqwHK-0007PY-5V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 06:54:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 11:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51883 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 51883-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51883.163801399528418 (code B ref 51883); Sat, 27 Nov 2021 11:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51883) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2021 11:53:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33085 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqwGZ-0007OI-Eh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 06:53:15 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:51330) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqwGW-0007O9-Ve for 51883@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 06:53:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1638013991; bh=Gt/txtzwYn578KXihcJvJs3u7VDK93I4c+H24lg+9Nk=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=DE0RrYpXdTPtsVrJQ+U7vCCHEUirV6dUjJOI78yz5uXOPRobBZ5g3IlFtb9Chstw8 yROL9ATa9bSGsw0sjBbqKB9/IuUdK7VD2kS311ThwZOFA/6GqeHnL6IawzKQIq71XB HFPNRX77bg+q4Mse4NZyiFQj33qzX3LoZlkz1wHaAs2/S4sNL/oPnhv9MsxX6CHmlM LvZaycEAMLjkFnWyUal6DBsptcA4AEyDzg10ZZnB/hN8bWT6I7SFugtYl5+Ufi6f9p sXiIIlRMOI2fJhxmLrPd2ODxG2WNw5vkfPcCQrYsRUrGPvxi8rqrLVvQe3thfuJ5vR nRPyjWnpZ2YPw== In-Reply-To: <87tufxg78p.fsf@web.de> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:220905 Archived-At: > > Thanks for your work so far. > > I tested your patch quickly. It works! > Thanks for your feedback! > > But I noticed that C-x 5 u without prefix arg errors. This is probably > not intended. I think you rather want to test the raw prefix arg with > `consp', not with `listp'. But why not just use (interactive "p")? > This is intended, it's what Eli wanted, unless I misunderstood what he meant. In a previous version of the patch C-x 5 u without prefix arg undeleted the last deleted frame. Now an explicit numerical prefix argument between 1 and 16 is required.