From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51883: 29.0.50; Command to get accidentally deleted frames back Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:42:00 +0000 Message-ID: <227d35a5bc14f7b3c75c@heytings.org> References: <87czn1gfb1.fsf@web.de> <838rxo0zk7.fsf@gnu.org> <83tugbyliv.fsf@gnu.org> <1adc044f473776dc3748@heytings.org> <83v90ouyp7.fsf@gnu.org> <664b6d0147a183b153f7@heytings.org> <87tufxg78p.fsf@web.de> <227d35a5bcbeda91dd8b@heytings.org> <83fsrhztvn.fsf@gnu.org> <87lf19g529.fsf@web.de> <838rx9zs9r.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7bxg2d8.fsf@web.de> <835ysdzq4s.fsf@gnu.org> <87czmlg1rz.fsf@web.de> <227d35a5bc25a5f57453@heytings.org> <87zgppekxe.fsf@web.de> <227d35a5bcdae0a85f4d@heytings.org> <87v90dekii.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8350"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 51883@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 27 15:43:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mqyuz-0001zU-LL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 15:43:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46860 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqyux-0000nv-Kx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:43:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60628) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqyus-0000ni-1c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:43:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50044) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqyur-0000PL-Q4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:43:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqyur-0005wv-OG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:43:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51883 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 51883-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51883.163802412422799 (code B ref 51883); Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:43:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51883) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2021 14:42:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33357 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqytw-0005vc-37 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:42:04 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:51578) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqytt-0005um-Pe for 51883@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:42:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1638024120; bh=SqcGdQa0amD+iEU/3yZjC+DlyZ6Nts0NiTT2A+2+1yA=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=am74DH9vqhM80aQXVcp3b4GpE19tMKVOitGw0bRRDfivaYId1ncVy9RqIw1WBBgz9 wNkO2Bd6bgQPLJkAIsWgAT7jh4Lzae8e8nLWAz/lai6skwb3TN1AlFN8APa862hAly QlGd3zawtRGVuz9aaHB6iaoPxwkKQU7lwzE44NP8tBcDGYZrH49PLnwHU1Sqsstndl sU4ExBtqJcC9ycMG6S0cBGX8Q4b79IUSkgTGehbmuH82VQ090AOSRmq5tiMMVyKJj3 Lo41MiziOGNnArlSiNECQAfBbSkmigf7ponf+xceVc5lfIbhqO0zgxwJgANEsuhzVF Bw3g+2D1SLhqg== In-Reply-To: <87v90dekii.fsf@web.de> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:220934 Archived-At: >> An error, something like "You didn't specify a frame number." > > What's different in this case, compared to commands that do use > (interactive "p")? Why is raising an error here better than doing what > at least some people expect? > They will not expect it if the docstring (and the error message) mentions that an explicit numerical argument must be given. And I don't think that "undelete the fourth most recently deleted frame with just C-u" is something anyone would expect, in fact I think it would be more confusing than helpful. Moreover I want to keep the C-u prefix free for later use.