From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Paul W. Rankin" via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24193: 25.1; `window-min-size' fails for horizontal width when margins >= body text Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2020 00:54:21 +1000 Organization: By Dasein Message-ID: <2263fe3a9530eb4f7f1b5cc82848f663@bydasein.com> References: <1470734067.1046352.690034953.5B0A54FE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <57A9A714.4010600@gmx.at> <1470736919.1056423.690073473.51DB916F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <57A9AD24.6090303@gmx.at> <1470739033.1062589.690104169.1A130EC9@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83ziomgfcd.fsf@gnu.org> <1470755912.754355.690353977.4F305064@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83r39ygcr5.fsf@gnu.org> <1471151490.3505042.694683657.3D32B261@webmail.messagingengine.com> <831t1rh14o.fsf@gnu.org> <57B17D1C.7070200@gmx.at> <83shu6f519.fsf@gnu.org> <57B2C245.3090409@gmx.at> <83fuq4g5jw.fsf@gnu.org> <1472789204.526419.713461185.62C22AFA@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87zh65adso.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: "Paul W. Rankin" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17674"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Purely Mail via Roundcube/1.4.7 Cc: 24193@debbugs.gnu.org, martin rudalics , Paul Rankin , Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 04 17:07:40 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kEDJQ-0004OL-JW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 17:07:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56072 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEDJP-0004se-MD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 11:07:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42242) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEDC6-0000xz-Q1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 11:00:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57040) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEDC6-0007XB-DN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 11:00:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEDC6-0006Vt-Bf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 11:00:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Paul W. Rankin" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 15:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24193 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 24193-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24193.159923156024964 (code B ref 24193); Fri, 04 Sep 2020 15:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24193) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2020 14:59:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40353 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEDBP-0006Ua-O2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 10:59:20 -0400 Original-Received: from sendmail.purelymail.com ([34.202.193.197]:48762) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kED7E-0006OC-Ug for 24193@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 10:55:01 -0400 Feedback-ID: 791:353:null:purelymail Feedback-ID: 791:353:null:purelymail Feedback-ID: 791:353:null:purelymail Feedback-ID: 791:353:null:purelymail Feedback-ID: 791:353:null:purelymail DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=Aj2E8hgOf0y1hVjvudMr2cJNEit5HqMdHGQc9UhyLDLAIYJ1CeCbrt633n8yGq2pxssXMpzRrlUGcr0YYsPkRMPRXHT7u5tqqYpcYe4kQiM9diPFlYD7U1QCUmz2bALYk+anaq7+Zv0wZqFqfLCElGMWTu3hgAdD5oDatJLKrBKDNdswdCPPNZXOKlBYvb47BXUuevIL/rCrok8QzleYQSPlX7gb+5igyb6dgl3g5VXNxYaFF7BknAoBL2oRLf8DGZ7FOMyWnvZJnkn/OV/1hFZj7coT4CBy8V/IzdyziFDu9yuieXmIknHSXlxJxSWDQppkLVsjACRu+HLo0U1Ahg==; s=purelymail3; d=bydasein.com; v=1; bh=qRo0qCv0WoD+EUb1pbJQiJqhGu1qEadlhho3/CtImNY=; h=Received:From:To; DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=RAWtK1pr1m8r9Ksey9pkSXh6ag6VkTh7IdyAk8VyHwz01cFjb847aADFsEZre0kRzhc9vLCAFAQsJ1YlRLHDUJukBmhBYVYprR1w/VGv5bs9HTdzbS4kKMlbuGRgNhLNxxbfIWLcW+xjme8L+tVwlIOkZwr06DxvjoTlDOoHRspQ4PkjhszM5u34qGXCjO+so9vHb7ymyc2ONEkVEEvT2Xmd8kSukESSxejyg2vHMxFpgwDqjvD6y2ugw/BACwnntpqYzQZ4Ehvq14AfIM7EEfWNWURkJg4Zi56yjjK5m1YeLuebkEulxmeTpucSaWp+0GOVo43W1Hfvu8v0EqGwmQ==; s=purelymail3; d=purelymail.com; v=1; bh=qRo0qCv0WoD+EUb1pbJQiJqhGu1qEadlhho3/CtImNY=; h=Received:From:To; X-Pm-Original-To: 24193@debbugs.gnu.org Original-Received: from 3.82.248.112 (EHLO inbox.purelymail.com) ([3.82.248.112]) by ip-172-30-0-247.ec2.internal (JAMES SMTP Server ) with ESMTPA ID -1666560395; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 14:54:21 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87zh65adso.fsf@gnus.org> X-Sender: pwr@bydasein.com X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 10:59:18 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:187147 Archived-At: On 2020-09-04 23:09, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Paul Rankin writes: >> Turns out there is a better solution, so the patch can be removed >> before stable 25.1 release if you prefer :) > > Skimming this thread, Martin's patch was applied (which seemed to fix > the issue?), but then Paul said there's a better solution? (But not > what it was.) > > So I'm not sure whether there's more to do here, or whether the bug > report should be closed. Anybody? I was mistaken. The min-margins parameter is still required. Sorry for the confusion.