From: Mike Kupfer <m.kupfer@acm.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: 22692@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
Subject: bug#22692: 25.0.91; xref-find-definitions fails to prompt
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 19:36:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2249.1456025761@allegro.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 20 Feb 2016 10:45:41 +0200." <83twl3py6i.fsf@gnu.org>
Hmm, I'm afraid I've gotten lost in all the recent discussion.
If the documentation is made consistent with the (default) behavior,
that would address my core concern. But it sounds like finding the
right wording ("at" versus "at or near") is a problem because different
backends could have different behavior. If that's true, would "at, or
possibly near" (or something like that) work?
I'd still like for "valid" to be removed from "valid identifier" because
of the ambiguity about what counts as "valid" in this context.
mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-21 3:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-16 1:02 bug#22692: 25.0.91; xref-find-definitions fails to prompt Mike Kupfer
2016-02-16 3:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-02-16 10:10 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-02-16 16:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-02-16 10:12 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-02-17 1:55 ` Mike Kupfer
2016-02-19 13:43 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-02-19 15:10 ` Mike Kupfer
2016-02-19 15:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-02-19 18:08 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-02-19 18:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-02-19 18:52 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-02-19 20:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-02-20 1:28 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-02-20 8:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-02-21 3:36 ` Mike Kupfer [this message]
2016-02-21 22:56 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-02-23 0:43 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-02-23 2:19 ` Mike Kupfer
2016-02-18 3:45 ` bug#22692: docstring for xref-find-definitions Mike Kupfer
2016-02-18 16:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-02-18 18:48 ` Mike Kupfer
2016-02-19 13:04 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-02-19 13:01 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-02-19 15:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-02-20 1:24 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-02-20 8:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-02-23 0:04 ` Juri Linkov
2016-02-23 0:35 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-02-27 10:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-02-27 12:35 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-02-27 12:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-02-29 2:48 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-02-23 0:41 ` Drew Adams
2016-02-21 3:42 ` Mike Kupfer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2249.1456025761@allegro.localdomain \
--to=m.kupfer@acm.org \
--cc=22692@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=dgutov@yandex.ru \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).