From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Marshall Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21110: 25.0.50; Images viewed with Image[Imagemagick] mode are garbled Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 13:18:49 +0100 Message-ID: <21938.11561.256985.229831@capuchin.co.uk> References: <87twswbi0o.fsf@capuchin.co.uk> <83io9c43mg.fsf@gnu.org> <21935.47975.804706.106523@capuchin.co.uk> <83egk040oe.fsf@gnu.org> <21936.47984.458242.799724@capuchin.co.uk> <837fpq53bv.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1437740369 3134 80.91.229.3 (24 Jul 2015 12:19:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:19:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21110@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 24 14:19:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZIbwX-0005Hl-17 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:19:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44924 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZIbwW-0006sh-4z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:19:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39813) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZIbwN-0006m9-VQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:19:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZIbwM-00028v-KE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:19:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56424) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZIbwM-00027n-Fc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:19:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZIbwL-0001sD-W5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:19:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Marshall Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21110 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21110-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21110.14377403337182 (code B ref 21110); Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21110) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jul 2015 12:18:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57870 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZIbwD-0001rm-BI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:18:53 -0400 Original-Received: from know-smtprelay-omc-3.server.virginmedia.net ([80.0.253.67]:39731) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZIbwA-0001ra-So for 21110@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:18:51 -0400 Original-Received: from capuchin.co.uk ([86.1.25.150]) by know-smtprelay-3-imp with bizsmtp id wCJp1q00x3EJRsN01CJp0V; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 13:18:49 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [86.1.25.150] X-Spam: 0 X-Authority: v=2.1 cv=TYVrzkkh c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=M7xYXag64YmbaeErs/qbeg==:117 a=M7xYXag64YmbaeErs/qbeg==:17 a=oWwmHH8kAAAA:8 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=zOBTXjUuO1YA:10 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=Z_eyhw1UJmUVfrsip7oA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Original-Received: from poulenc.faure (poulenc [192.168.0.14]) by capuchin.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE9D919F3BB; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 13:25:18 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <837fpq53bv.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 25.0.50.3 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:105103 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > > Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:01:20 +0100 > > From: Robert Marshall > > Cc: 21110@debbugs.gnu.org > >=20 > > I can confirm that building without Cairo stops the corruption >=20 > If you can afford one more test, perhaps try building with Cairo, bu= t > without Imagemagick (and with the rest of image support libraries). > The Cairo build makes quite a bit of difference in image.c, but only= > one of them is related to the Imagemagick part, so I think it's > important to understand whether this issue with Cairo is specific to= > Imagemagick or to images in general. >=20 I did a ./configure --without-imagemagick --with-cairo and build and with that version graphic files are no longer garbled (It would be good IMHO if the INSTALL file mentioned the --without-imagemagick option alongside the --without-jpeg options rather than my having to dig through the configure script) > Does anyone else have problems with Imagemagick (or images in genera= l) > in the Cairo build? >=20 > > > Use "M-x customize-variable RET" to disable all Imagemagick typ= es. > > > > > =20 > > I tried this and disabled png support in imagemagick-enabled-types= but > > still when I load a png the mode is reported as > >=20 > > 'Image[imagemagick] mode defined in =E2=80=98image-mode.el=E2=80=99= ' > >=20 > > which I assume means that it's still using imagemagick? >=20 > Probably. Building without Imagemagick would resolve the mystery. >=20 C-h m in a png file now gives me 'Image[png] mode defined in image-mod= e.el'=20 > > > Btw, please do send a screenshot with the corrupted images, mayb= e > > > seeing it will give more ideas. > > =20 > > Emailed yesterday >=20 > Yes, thanks. Basically, I understand that the "image" shown by Emac= s > contains no traces of the image itself, only some random garbage fro= m > some entirely different graphics context, is that right? >=20 Well if there is anything from the image it is well hidden! Robert