From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: jonas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27647: 26.0.50; Line numbers implemented natively disappear momentarily when frame out of focus Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 15:03:32 +0200 Message-ID: <213d35bf-fa32-fb03-54e4-4e8d81148e0c@gmail.com> References: <83eftnitpj.fsf@gnu.org> <83bmorjba2.fsf@gnu.org> <83eftliuk5.fsf@gnu.org> <83o9sgb8ni.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------8C94171D92CA05FE013EB7F6" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507208668 16340 195.159.176.226 (5 Oct 2017 13:04:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:04:28 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 Cc: 27647@debbugs.gnu.org To: Kaushal Modi Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 05 15:04:11 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e05os-0002KJ-U3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 15:04:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39760 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e05p0-0004Gr-FE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:04:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39845) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e05ou-0004Gc-9p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:04:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e05oq-0002TH-BY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:04:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41191) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e05oq-0002T7-7j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:04:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e05op-0007KZ-QG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:04:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: jonas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 13:04:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27647 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 27647-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27647.150720862228150 (code B ref 27647); Thu, 05 Oct 2017 13:04:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27647) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Oct 2017 13:03:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49872 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e05oU-0007Jy-G9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:03:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-f47.google.com ([209.85.215.47]:43062) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e05oS-0007Jj-88 for 27647@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:03:40 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf0-f47.google.com with SMTP id o125so12280568lfe.0 for <27647@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 06:03:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=C36VvyrnxO4GclwulWrEPycJ0x64Np1NppSDwosIH2Q=; b=YUSr/kzN4sesLQj73MG94eiFAncZImvTbWjGsoDY5iOhoYv1iHzPeD7P/QeSw7haC9 nktWHeliSPmAQqqTJIFAzVbYOb/6DUrkLqyYY4NsmX5V+x4ivVpzKB8gsSCHAjxOT8EP 8OFiQkTK0kkoI9EB/KlN/qs0qLt4vf4HaWIFZEPlk2+WxXbuK2GGPocKYu/h7P2jNff7 BMrqjVhOp8AkyngA9D/EXGmhaxLLaGOUbiwXMd8yoK5T2SjHWATq7W6sDNI2z3viZqkM IVIPo6y2tu7yzzQRYchqxdECFOP5195fCWyfTT1FlrM+xPEiH6NJ1O9od8Syf5IIgyx2 w1+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=C36VvyrnxO4GclwulWrEPycJ0x64Np1NppSDwosIH2Q=; b=ll4Kre3MbEn5MHX2gGKUUR+iHTsmEJGjRQbNbGrXLPdddLxWC4s9nIYnL3X0JQnzQf +9xVWYmp17v7MePdAlYn+Nz/3OsHBNy9snjx/XwhfTU6YsH0s4Jz3EefVKIEUUi00qAz o2hoRLKCxjmzfD2hKlYqWEzXRpYYIVvShCj67nxynWxmByJlTIlXEe2R6FvCMaL20u8z gqihCfNG/m5HfcbOhBkxuvTrTSm6JOHm/ARuv/Tet4oR2EvYG5h+bCugJ5ZAHsc8klEI 16anLw38mRdxyKot7q46ImrTFMuA1BBVqH9jeFMqKUeTcWXtAwuKzWeX8mjJreNAHN0o oFtg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXEvhhcLPNzUgwpm/mbQSBoejHr91UDJJSgx6TigdPPNAwMuy61 VwSnRsRgjKRs80Oyv5prv6tmBFDr X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDZMCjmRZYpB7S9ZcTuT3D2H+pKaCiJQ74HDtGPmgSDP1CS6x+qAppKmYxQEVhWs/Z0Sd0D9A== X-Received: by 10.46.20.9 with SMTP id u9mr354448ljd.39.1507208614011; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 06:03:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (h-4-149-139.A163.priv.bahnhof.se. [155.4.149.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g141sm2975145lfg.70.2017.10.05.06.03.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Oct 2017 06:03:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:137966 Archived-At: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------8C94171D92CA05FE013EB7F6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Unfortunately, no. The issue is consistent, but I had difficulties creating a detailed recipe for it. For me, the issue was limited to flycheck-pos-tip which interacts with the windowing system through the pos-tip package. No modification of display-line-numbers took place. I ended up replacing the package with flycheck-popup-tip, which displays its information inside an emacs buffer, and the problem disappeared. So at a glance the issue seem to be deeper than just being config-related, but I am not knowledgeable enough to draw any real conclusions. On 2017-10-05 14:40, Kaushal Modi wrote: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 2:10 PM Eli Zaretskii > wrote: > > I thought about that, but I'm afraid it could cause an infinite series > of unrelated hits, each time Kaushal switches between buffers.  It may > make editing impractical. > > But if I'm mistaken, why not? > > > Hi Eli, Noam, > > As you know from my other thread, I am unable to use gdb. As I don't > know enough C to hack it myself, can you provide pointers to where I > can put print statements or something like that in the C code directly > to help with this debug? > > Another thing, debbugs seems to have stopped emailing the bug authors! > > Emails sent to just this debbugs don't reach me, like this reply[1] or > this[2]. Can you guys please CC me on further replies? > > @Jonas: Any luck creating a recipe for this? > > @Eli: This problem is consistent, though not consistent enough to yet > create a recipe. But it does happen at least once a day. I am still > sticking on to native line numbers and not giving up. Can this be > please made a blocker for 26.1? > > > [1]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27647#38 > [2]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27647#39 > -- > > Kaushal Modi > --------------8C94171D92CA05FE013EB7F6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Unfortunately, no. The issue is consistent, but I had difficulties creating a detailed recipe for it.

For me, the issue was limited to flycheck-pos-tip which interacts with the windowing system through the pos-tip package. No modification of display-line-numbers took place.

I ended up replacing the package with flycheck-popup-tip, which displays its information inside an emacs buffer, and the problem disappeared. So at a glance the issue seem to be deeper than just being config-related, but I am not knowledgeable enough to draw any real conclusions.


On 2017-10-05 14:40, Kaushal Modi wrote:
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 2:10 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
I thought about that, but I'm afraid it could cause an infinite series
of unrelated hits, each time Kaushal switches between buffers.  It may
make editing impractical.

But if I'm mistaken, why not?

Hi Eli, Noam,

As you know from my other thread, I am unable to use gdb. As I don't know enough C to hack it myself, can you provide pointers to where I can put print statements or something like that in the C code directly to help with this debug?

Another thing, debbugs seems to have stopped emailing the bug authors!

Emails sent to just this debbugs don't reach me, like this reply[1] or this[2]. Can you guys please CC me on further replies?

@Jonas: Any luck creating a recipe for this?

@Eli: This problem is consistent, though not consistent enough to yet create a recipe. But it does happen at least once a day. I am still sticking on to native line numbers and not giving up. Can this be please made a blocker for 26.1?


--

Kaushal Modi


--------------8C94171D92CA05FE013EB7F6--