From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mike Kupfer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51902: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Get mh-e tests to pass Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 09:15:52 -0800 Message-ID: <21387.1637169352@alto> References: <8735nvws3j.fsf@dick> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28801"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , dick , 51902@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stephen Gildea Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 17 18:16:44 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mnOY7-0007Hu-Rj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 18:16:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52080 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mnOY5-00027l-IV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 12:16:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44172) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mnOXS-00026T-9T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 12:16:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50443) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mnOXS-0006A4-0R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 12:16:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mnOXR-0007Gy-Sg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 12:16:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mike Kupfer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 17:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51902 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 51902-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51902.163716936127950 (code B ref 51902); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 17:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51902) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2021 17:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33756 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mnOXQ-0007Gh-VV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 12:16:01 -0500 Original-Received: from shell1.rawbw.com ([198.144.192.42]:13765 ident=root) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mnOXP-0007GZ-G1 for 51902@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 12:16:00 -0500 Original-Received: from alto (96-95-200-133-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [96.95.200.133]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id 1AHHFqKs074672 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 09:15:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mkupfer@alum.berkeley.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host 96-95-200-133-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [96.95.200.133] claimed to be alto In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:23:59 -0800." <1272061.1637166239@tigger3.sg.gildea.net> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 28.0.60 Content-ID: <21386.1637169352.1@alto> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:220235 Archived-At: Stephen Gildea wrote: > I get failure with both Mailutils 3.7 and 3.13. Is it just the "+/" tests, or are there other failures? My notes say I got a clean run with the old mh-unit tests on Mailutils 3.5, except for the "+/tmp" tests. Based on my notes, I also had a copy of Mailutils 3.10, which I played with briefly and expected to pass the tests, but it looks like I never actually ran the test suite on Mailutils 3.10. In any case, it looks like we should mark the tests that fail with Mailutils as expected to fail for that variant, and circle back later to address them. mike