From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Marshall Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17046: 24.3.50; On startup emacs frame has no minibuffer or windows decorations Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:33:29 +0000 Message-ID: <21296.42153.768572.7270@capuchin.co.uk> References: <87bnx1me40.fsf@capuchin.co.uk> <532DAA47.5020101@gmx.at> <532DAD2D.9050508@gmx.at> <21293.47677.273344.433965@capuchin.co.uk> <532DD9C8.2090209@gmx.at> <532DE5C8.3070308@gmx.at> <21293.61407.237813.539443@capuchin.co.uk> <532E022A.1010401@gmx.at> <21294.2992.133359.234317@capuchin.co.uk> <532EB366.8070801@gmx.at> <21294.49676.124258.183227@capuchin.co.uk> <532EC7F7.2060307@gmx.at> <21294.58410.934138.908538@capuchin.co.uk> <532EE6F9.50003@gmx.at> <21294.61472.376055.235383@capuchin.co.uk> <532EF5F3.5040706@gmx.at> <21294.64295.631988.273738@capuchin.co.uk> <532EFDB1.9020902@gmx.at> <21295.1905.505188.563594@capuchin.co.uk> <532F10C7.6030801@gmx.at> <21295.5581.394024.241655@capuchin.co.uk> <532F19C0.4020902@gmx.at> <21295.7482.513409.93351@capuchin.co.uk> <21295.14057.185786.863083@capuchin.co.uk> <21295.21403.534064.434296@capuchin.co.uk> <21295.59468.82731.2394@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.7931.103056.823206@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.12737.48072.487144@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.19864.25566.342047@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.22701.448897.930196@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.26536.10078.165484@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.32260.291274.364373@capuchin.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395696850 13493 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2014 21:34:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17046@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 24 22:34:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WSCVe-0006Jt-Oc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 22:34:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38455 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSCVe-0007bd-CV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:34:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51931) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSCVV-0007bO-MK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:34:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSCVP-0004OD-7m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:34:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46927) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSCVP-0004Nx-3g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WSCVO-0002qQ-C7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Marshall Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17046 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17046-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17046.139569680910889 (code B ref 17046); Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17046) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Mar 2014 21:33:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48109 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WSCUr-0002pX-45 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:33:29 -0400 Original-Received: from know-smtprelay-omc-10.server.virginmedia.net ([80.0.253.74]:54280) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WSCUn-0002pL-Qz for 17046@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:33:26 -0400 Original-Received: from capuchin.co.uk ([86.1.25.150]) by know-smtprelay-10-imp with bizsmtp id hZZQ1n01N3EJRsN01ZZQYR; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:33:24 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [86.1.25.150] X-Spam: 0 X-Authority: v=2.1 cv=Qfbov6rv c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=M7xYXag64YmbaeErs/qbeg==:117 a=M7xYXag64YmbaeErs/qbeg==:17 a=oWwmHH8kAAAA:8 a=ZoWAZ9ph8JIA:10 a=aGljky2k91gA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=xPaWf1kEaCgW61VtL-4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=AsZ_qQByYSAA:10 Original-Received: from poulenc.faure (poulenc [192.168.0.9]) by capuchin.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C192EDCA9; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:33:22 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.50.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:87332 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Robert Marshall wrote: > > > (horizontal-scroll-bars . t) ; ! > > Yes, a typo, sorry. > > > I'm assuming that because the ones in the first group appeared in the > > buggy run and not in the other, I need to add these to the version > > with (display... commented out and see if the bug occurs? I added > > them incrementally - (environment) and then (environment) and > > (height...) and so on until all 4 were active > > There were 5, not 4. > So there were, that's one error each ;-) though height was already there in the parameters so my eye must have elided it, I've just tried it with 36 (rather than 30) and that doesn't make the version without display error. > > them only active at a time and the bug did not appear > > Hmm. I'm running out of ideas. > > Please test the attached version. In the parameter list, I've added > the five parameters of the previous message. The idea is to test them > as a group, so four runs: > > - with (display . ":0") and the five parameters above > - with (display . ":0") and none of the five > - without display, in both cases. > > Each run will generate in *Messages* two dumps from the frame > parameter list, but I'm only interested in these in the case(s) where > the bug appears. > I've done all 4 runs and none of them produced the bug! I assume this isn't what you expected, I see some of the parameters to frameset-restore are different. R -- Robert Marshall