From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Marshall Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17046: 24.3.50; On startup emacs frame has no minibuffer or windows decorations Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:48:36 +0000 Message-ID: <21296.32260.291274.364373@capuchin.co.uk> References: <87bnx1me40.fsf@capuchin.co.uk> <532DAA47.5020101@gmx.at> <532DAD2D.9050508@gmx.at> <21293.47677.273344.433965@capuchin.co.uk> <532DD9C8.2090209@gmx.at> <532DE5C8.3070308@gmx.at> <21293.61407.237813.539443@capuchin.co.uk> <532E022A.1010401@gmx.at> <21294.2992.133359.234317@capuchin.co.uk> <532EB366.8070801@gmx.at> <21294.49676.124258.183227@capuchin.co.uk> <532EC7F7.2060307@gmx.at> <21294.58410.934138.908538@capuchin.co.uk> <532EE6F9.50003@gmx.at> <21294.61472.376055.235383@capuchin.co.uk> <532EF5F3.5040706@gmx.at> <21294.64295.631988.273738@capuchin.co.uk> <532EFDB1.9020902@gmx.at> <21295.1905.505188.563594@capuchin.co.uk> <532F10C7.6030801@gmx.at> <21295.5581.394024.241655@capuchin.co.uk> <532F19C0.4020902@gmx.at> <21295.7482.513409.93351@capuchin.co.uk> <21295.14057.185786.863083@capuchin.co.uk> <21295.21403.534064.434296@capuchin.co.uk> <21295.59468.82731.2394@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.7931.103056.823206@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.12737.48072.487144@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.19864.25566.342047@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.22701.448897.930196@capuchin.co.uk> <21296.26536.10078.165484@capuchin.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395686953 8880 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2014 18:49:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:49:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17046@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 24 19:49:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WS9w0-0003BJ-Uu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:49:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37962 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS9w0-0003ex-Iu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:49:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46169) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS9vr-0003eg-Aq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:49:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS9vk-0000dD-0N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:49:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46795) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS9vj-0000d5-SN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:49:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WS9vi-0005O6-Nm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:49:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Marshall Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17046 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17046-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17046.139568692120669 (code B ref 17046); Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17046) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Mar 2014 18:48:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47977 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WS9vM-0005NI-Ah for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:48:40 -0400 Original-Received: from know-smtprelay-omc-10.server.virginmedia.net ([80.0.253.74]:37737) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WS9vE-0005N4-Bk for 17046@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:48:33 -0400 Original-Received: from capuchin.co.uk ([86.1.25.150]) by know-smtprelay-10-imp with bizsmtp id hWoW1n0123EJRsN01WoWwn; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:48:31 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [86.1.25.150] X-Spam: 0 X-Authority: v=2.1 cv=Qfbov6rv c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=M7xYXag64YmbaeErs/qbeg==:117 a=M7xYXag64YmbaeErs/qbeg==:17 a=oWwmHH8kAAAA:8 a=ZoWAZ9ph8JIA:10 a=aGljky2k91gA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=MTloL3cyMTTy-SNkEm0A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 Original-Received: from poulenc.faure (poulenc [192.168.0.9]) by capuchin.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4548DCA9; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:48:29 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.50.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:87329 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: > Interesting. There aren't that many differences between the frames. > The possibly significant ones: > > (environment) > (height . 36) > (horizontall-scroll-bars . t) (horizontal-scroll-bars . t) ; ! > (left . 896) > (window-system . x) > > vs. > > (height . 30) > (left . 0) > > So I'd suggest adding them (the ones in the first group) one by one to > your bug17046.el, and repeat the tests. Comment out the `let' from the > previous message, there's no need to report the frame parameters now, > just whether some case fails / works when previously it would've > worked / failed instead. I'm assuming that because the ones in the first group appeared in the buggy run and not in the other, I need to add these to the version with (display... commented out and see if the bug occurs? I added them incrementally - (environment) and then (environment) and (height...) and so on until all 4 were active and then ran with one of them only active at a time and the bug did not appear (so 7 runs in all). R -- Robert Marshall