From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Marshall Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17046: 24.3.50; On startup emacs frame has no minibuffer or windows decorations Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 20:17:35 +0000 Message-ID: <21293.61407.237813.539443@capuchin.co.uk> References: <87bnx1me40.fsf@capuchin.co.uk> <532ABA74.5060206@gmx.at> <21290.56690.254740.791923@capuchin.co.uk> <532AE836.2030907@gmx.at> <21290.64241.176419.931155@capuchin.co.uk> <532B4016.7010508@gmx.at> <21291.20160.94341.637290@capuchin.co.uk> <532BF24A.6090703@gmx.at> <21292.6903.499178.348@capuchin.co.uk> <532C5595.2090800@gmx.at> <21292.28324.463848.983080@capuchin.co.uk> <532C7A06.6080703@gmx.at> <532D5A7E.7010700@gmx.at> <21293.30111.645044.742129@capuchin.co.uk> <532D93D9.10101@gmx.at> <532D9C4A.8040509@gmx.at> <532DAA47.5020101@gmx.at> <532DAD2D.9050508@gmx.at> <21293.47677.273344.433965@capuchin.co.uk> <532DD9C8.2090209@gmx.at> <532DE5C8.3070308@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395519493 16750 80.91.229.3 (22 Mar 2014 20:18:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 20:18:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , 17046@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 22 21:18:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WRSN2-0003al-OK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 21:18:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58045 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRSN2-0006GR-AH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:18:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58332) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRSMr-0006G7-Tr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:18:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRSMk-0005eQ-KW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:18:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43937) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRSMk-0005eM-Gn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRSMk-0008Un-0n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Marshall Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 20:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17046 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17046-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17046.139551946032624 (code B ref 17046); Sat, 22 Mar 2014 20:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17046) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Mar 2014 20:17:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45119 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRSMN-0008U7-7L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:17:39 -0400 Original-Received: from know-smtprelay-omc-10.server.virginmedia.net ([80.0.253.74]:40971) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRSML-0008Ty-BS for 17046@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:17:38 -0400 Original-Received: from capuchin.co.uk ([86.1.25.150]) by know-smtprelay-10-imp with bizsmtp id gkHa1n0133EJRsN01kHaMV; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 20:17:36 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [86.1.25.150] X-Spam: 0 X-Authority: v=2.1 cv=Qfbov6rv c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=M7xYXag64YmbaeErs/qbeg==:117 a=M7xYXag64YmbaeErs/qbeg==:17 a=oWwmHH8kAAAA:8 a=Xj_Xx-c6XBUA:10 a=aGljky2k91gA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=mi5BHAPO-g-58vxXAsgA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 Original-Received: from poulenc.faure (poulenc [192.168.0.9]) by capuchin.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D554DCA9; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 20:17:33 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: <532DE5C8.3070308@gmx.at> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.50.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:87193 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: > > Yes, though I prefer using "emacs -Q -l file.el" because desktop does > > many other things, like trying to restore modes, global and local > > variables, etc. > > OK. But the problem is IMO that Robert ran this with a frameset derived > from the a saved desktop of the bad frame. This won't reproduce the > problem because that frameset is likely OK (I did not see any > inconsistencies in the frame dump at least). We have to run this with a > frameset derived from the original two windows frame. I hope I attached > a correct version in my last mail, please have a look. > The frameset in Juanma's bug17046.el file only appeared to have one window (in as far as I understand the format!) and I've just tried all 4 tests with the file (& frameset) that was attached to his email (adding a find-file of .emacs) and one window (onto .emacs) appears and no sign of the problem So I've tried it with your version of bug17046.el (now with 2 find-files) > Now if that frameset produces two windows as I expect, we know that the > problem is with transforming the initial Emacs frame, which apparently > is not good for restoring this desktop. Then we have to step by step > remove lines from bug17046.el until we arrive at the line that causes > the problem. > This does produce 2 windows but in no case is there a sign of the problem - or is that what you are expecting? I wondered about the (visibility . icon) line (I don't think I ever started it up iconized) and tried the tests both with and without it with the same result. If I don't include the 2 find-files I get a single window onto *Messages* Not sure whether it is relevant - or you've already assumed this - there's no resize facility on the bad frame (apart from maximize) move the mouse to the window corner and no resize arrows appear. -- Robert Marshall