From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Heime via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#65348: INITIAL-INPUT in completing-read repeats same entry twice consecutively Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 05:05:41 +0000 Message-ID: <20R1-cGUtXe8gGwpzmjNHlz39n0IhiK5lKCn-K1ojbdvMs9R2svYlvbpbFZRqgNZ5i8IYFSO_nitMCNWsw3hg1Zef3DJSjdgZSn5qjXcp8g=@protonmail.com> References: <7D2p2XmGzWwhYjrI_PaUsn8r_NaQf-B0eAf7AmeRIhBEl84z79j_jKky-Lqlt6nc52SQ7T5yrL9OdqUzou1Mh3zQzgJx-SV6kIvc9Km8bDg=@protonmail.com> Reply-To: Heime Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13112"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , "65348@debbugs.gnu.org" <65348@debbugs.gnu.org> To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 19 07:06:25 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qXEAK-0003Cm-Ru for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 19 Aug 2023 07:06:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qXE9z-0004Pu-E8; Sat, 19 Aug 2023 01:06:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qXE9x-0004PW-Oy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Aug 2023 01:06:01 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qXE9x-00035G-Gj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Aug 2023 01:06:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qXE9y-0007cw-9a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Aug 2023 01:06:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Heime Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 05:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65348 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 65348-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65348.169242155429301 (code B ref 65348); Sat, 19 Aug 2023 05:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 65348) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Aug 2023 05:05:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49223 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qXE9q-0007cX-ED for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Aug 2023 01:05:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-40141.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.141]:24635) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qXE9o-0007cF-0f for 65348@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Aug 2023 01:05:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1692421544; x=1692680744; bh=wwe5mwQGPG+TNhiJrok27Z0GqnmBTr4vHu6Ee4klV8o=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=G3fi0FHRBkKS66NFUX202lCavrsExqMXSxak4HgXV7uJ8tOHpgEy/VC8K2KnLj+u3 HRf3HPa3yd23h+oPXzt+zeer2un+p/8aZNSH7dL208UmfbR9jQwES5oEXdmQRSVHRI /eMRvgfjMIZIfR6lM9LCXc3VvZUdXvW/ebON8oFyWLrhgY8yM0gcZKxwGMG4Mwmwud 4jdiq1tHwTFMT+n3+x8QqweCW93bCkDODvVpiHA98PHigxDHqce2F9tTu/sBuaWgBv xwxxna63Losf/dOuM2cBBjTrAP1J1kEv8heh72/eZsnHZmBwnot2tJZhzf6YZ4AO7L keqGRF/SCGiBQ== In-Reply-To: Feedback-ID: 57735886:user:proton X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:267812 Archived-At: ------- Original Message ------- On Saturday, August 19th, 2023 at 4:46 PM, Drew Adams wrote: > > > > Would it not be better to COLLECTION and HISTORY separate ? > > >=20 > > > You already have my opinion: yes. And they always > > > have been, till Someone (TM) decided recently that > > > future history should include all of the candidates > > > in COLLECTION. > >=20 > > Right. Because entries in history ought to be stored in history > > as you input values, not before. >=20 >=20 > Not so, for "future history" (and that's why that cute > term isn't a good one). The so-called "future history" > is one or more DEFAULT values you can retrieve and use > as input if you like. >=20 > After use of DEFAULT (`M-n') got rebaptized as using > "future history", Someone (TM) got the dim idea to add > all of COLLECTION to that list, along with the DEFAULT > values. DEFAULT values belong, properly, to "future > history" (though that's a misleading misnomer). >=20 > But COLLECTION doesn't belong in "future history". > The reason isn't what you gave, though. It's proper > to fill the "future history" before you choose input, > but it's only proper to fill it with default values. > What's not good is to also fill it with all of the > possible completion choices. Eli, would there be some capability to improve the aforementioned function from the merits held by the discussion that is happening ?