From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23925: 25.0.95; display broken when maximizing frame Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 03:40:32 +0200 Message-ID: <2095b034-95e0-f185-c157-b92de9aff1cd@yandex.ru> References: <26943.50736.587398.22400@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <83wpkvgua6.fsf@gnu.org> <5780C7C0.5000607@gmail.com> <8d8bb416-c246-285c-6ae2-62c3b544aea3@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1544492355 7818 195.159.176.226 (11 Dec 2018 01:39:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 01:39:15 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:64.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/64.0 Cc: Roland Winkler To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel , 23925@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 11 02:39:11 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gWX0w-0001w6-QC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 02:39:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35486 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWX33-0002vk-D4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:41:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43633) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWX2s-0002vd-OC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:41:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWX2n-0002ab-Ov for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:41:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38264) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gWX2l-0002Y5-Ao for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:41:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gWX2j-0002AA-NM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:41:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 01:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23925 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: help Original-Received: via spool by 23925-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23925.15444924438280 (code B ref 23925); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 01:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23925) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2018 01:40:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42522 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gWX2Q-00029U-Qp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:40:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f41.google.com ([209.85.128.41]:39938) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gWX2P-00029F-B8 for 23925@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:40:41 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f41.google.com with SMTP id q26so515848wmf.5 for <23925@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:40:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=d0rIkAvM8LmfAGBH2BL5cdKDiaMIdS1RzkzujgnVjb4=; b=HG5NIe01SWH2TWlojPgBAjk6sHXN/x8s2IkdGkPLBKJk7gmTMkFHQVyuzk7lp+xeqq q2iUuATdYNjhUGOHjfmgAvFjgBOfeRN+7dO4vNg3NNzAAfDp2oxaxfGsiHCxLKmltix2 6+EBV4Wm6rI07Vx0UNlNM7kKnt2QMx6YQtacwf7y5AwXnmIkHkMrAS5XZlIyJBVKDT36 4nG4DWXzWD1GKoPyycpDzcGN9Fwi74Oc9dj1Q2vv8qGl7163cKsKnj0/RAePJBklKGK0 0icTyw9N8/NZOPjvmkLUJhwuSSAtLXleG6Vf0o/AuVNhKnwsIwocrZN9vfeWCz7WuP8F Y3EQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=d0rIkAvM8LmfAGBH2BL5cdKDiaMIdS1RzkzujgnVjb4=; b=d5QUCM12QGSA/oWhWlAD24/DAj2684F99h3lJERO2Q2zBgD7MF92PglKi1DJomU/aZ a4JH2/AEvwSGpWD0J6jiL+q92M6TKQ8kx7yA13uRmR3HPo5LNllc6nVDezXjRqeSRRtv CfhwXNzG0FRWlVFd1aZabQ8xnv5nyMF/nPQ4aFNcnHch99BErDRvIPPanMKDInlU+TQg SMX2a+CEMGG2F3ZTuopAWPNR8g0n8WZbZUyEgQh7eNbEitvw4l6msCaqRrdKCeDdvsya DXP1HmiazYtjINxTnPV0VqoM2VllcNePMrOZPXQ+kFMHtyEsdwMxP9+KE8VTC79wzNqb qr+A== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbPZidqpZgWqcmZ6f7wELYVd6Fg2hUUI42eTwWKmvePxqa9QyXw gDSatIColkgXdNUvYJ1J7XM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WrYAh7/BFRu8V+zFWdV0iZ908PfF7DdPIVsPjEjL409rah4x21F1Vo1pfzOvnX4HE0jXMh/w== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:e046:: with SMTP id x67mr503700wmg.122.1544492435569; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:40:35 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.174.23]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u204sm1235951wmu.30.2018.12.10.17.40.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:40:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8d8bb416-c246-285c-6ae2-62c3b544aea3@yandex.ru> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:153330 Archived-At: On 22.11.2018 16:12, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > I have just tried a --with-cairo build of the latest master, and can't > repro any of the symptoms described here, as long as Emacs is launched > with GDK_SCALE=1 (I have a HiDPI screen, and redisplay with scale=2 > looks very broken). And with the current emacs-26 branch, even that is not a problem. So to sum up, I'm failing to reproduce any of the problems described in this bug report. Could any of the previous commenters try?