From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Roland Winkler" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11580: [PATCH] Fix bug #11580 Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 20:58:53 -0500 Message-ID: <20586.19037.71231.725848@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <87ipb64w5x.fsf@riseup.net> <87mx0c655g.fsf__10545.1882271611$1348682125$gmane$org@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87d3152fxd.fsf@gnu.org> <20584.24939.541992.925590@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87d3113ass.fsf@riseup.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1349143191 697 80.91.229.3 (2 Oct 2012 01:59:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 01:59:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11580@debbugs.gnu.org To: Sergio Durigan Junior Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 02 03:59:57 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TIrlu-00010V-29 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 03:59:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43336 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIrlo-0003RN-HU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:59:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40635) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIrlm-0003RG-CG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:59:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIrll-00051p-IT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:59:34 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55609) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIrll-00051a-FF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:59:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TIrmE-0002jk-F7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 22:00:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Roland Winkler" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 02:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11580 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: help Original-Received: via spool by 11580-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11580.134914316810454 (code B ref 11580); Tue, 02 Oct 2012 02:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11580) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2012 01:59:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36922 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TIrlf-0002iY-OS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:59:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:36366) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TIrld-0002iR-PY for 11580@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:59:26 -0400 Original-Received: from adsl-68-77-18-65.dsl.emhril.ameritech.net ([68.77.18.65]:34157 helo=regnitz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIrl9-0003A7-Hu; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:58:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87d3113ass.fsf@riseup.net> X-Mailer: VM 8.2 trial under 24.1.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:65101 Archived-At: On Mon Oct 1 2012 Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > Thanks, the patch is simpler. I took the liberty to make a small > correction on your patch, which is to call (error "Unknown BBDB > attribute") instead of (setq val "Unknown BBDB attribute"), which I > think is a better way to handle it. I omitted this because I think one needs to modify some deep internals of BBDB to get the "Unknown BBDB attribute". (Have you ever seen a situation where this code is relevant?) In that sense, I believe it should not matter what the code is doing here. > So, is the patch below OK for mailine? Can you install? Or should I do it? Roland