From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Barzilay Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10776: Feature request: undo-able revert Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 21:56:25 -0500 Message-ID: <20276.34649.321994.988902@winooski.ccs.neu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328842621 14594 80.91.229.3 (10 Feb 2012 02:57:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:57:01 +0000 (UTC) To: 10776@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 10 03:56:58 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RvgfR-0008OR-Cs for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:56:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55097 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RvgfQ-0006su-SD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:56:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48533) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RvgfN-0006qt-Sn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:56:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RvgfM-00081F-1a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:56:53 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58951) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RvgfM-000818-05 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:56:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RvggU-0002JW-8Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:58:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Barzilay Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 10776 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13288426698867 (code B ref -1); Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2012 02:57:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34341 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RvggG-0002Iy-V7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:57:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43191) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RvggF-0002Im-2p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:57:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rvgf0-0007yq-6N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:56:31 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:46983) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rvgf0-0007ym-50 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:56:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48466) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rvgez-0006db-1v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:56:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rvgex-0007yO-Kv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:56:29 -0500 Original-Received: from winooski.ccs.neu.edu ([129.10.115.117]:49561) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rvgex-0007yH-D3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:56:27 -0500 Original-Received: from winooski.ccs.neu.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by winooski.ccs.neu.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1A2uQ68030008 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 21:56:26 -0500 Original-Received: (from eli@localhost) by winooski.ccs.neu.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q1A2uPXK030005; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 21:56:25 -0500 X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0a under 23.2.1 (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56749 Archived-At: Reverting a buffer discards the undo information -- it could be useful to have the revert be an undo-able operation to avoid losing work prior to a revert. (I have a hack that does this, and it's been an extremely important part of my workflow for more than 10 years now.) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!