> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 14:35:08 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: van.ly@sdf.org, 64698@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Cc: 64698@debbugs.gnu.org > > Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 18:22:50 +0800 > > From: Po Lu via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, > > the Swiss army knife of text editors" > > > > Van Ly writes: > > > > > On netbsd 9.3, the following configure options will let gmake build to > > > completion. > > > > [...] > > > > You have ommitted the compiler and Make output from the compilation, > > leaving only the troubleshooting instructions printed by the Makefile > > after it failed. > > > > Please include complete build output, or at least the actual error > > itself. > > Yes, please. > > Also, please tell what is the last commit on the emacs-29 branch that > you used to build (assuming you have built the emacs-29 branch of the > Emacs Git repository; if not, please tell what did you sue for the > sources). > The sour was unpacked from a complete emacs-29.0.92.tar.xz file and the sig detail is listed as part of the complete build output in the attached file. Attempting a git log command gives, $ git log fatal: not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git The xz file would have come from the gnu website for download announced on an emacs feed. The tooling I believe used was as follows, $ gmake -v GNU Make 4.3 Built for x86_64--netbsd $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 10.3.0 Here is the full build output. The fly in the soup is I interrupted the first unadultrated configure run since I recollected I didn't want X and ran './configure --without-x. That occurs at line 270 of 1985.