From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Madhu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50125: completion-in-region in shell.el Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 06:44:06 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <20210820.064406.1541156468687235659.enometh@meer.net> References: <874kbl4e2a.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6713"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 50125@debbugs.gnu.org To: larsi@gnus.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 20 03:15:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mGt7n-0001X2-4A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2021 03:15:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47444 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mGt7l-0007bZ-FN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:15:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51190) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mGt7e-0007bR-Bw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:15:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49452) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mGt7e-00068e-3k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:15:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mGt7d-0003cC-Tv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:15:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Madhu Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 01:15:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50125 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50125-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50125.162942204613820 (code B ref 50125); Fri, 20 Aug 2021 01:15:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50125) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Aug 2021 01:14:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60998 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mGt6k-0003aq-0i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:14:06 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp6.ctinetworks.com ([205.166.61.199]:35742) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mGt6h-0003ah-NI for 50125@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:14:04 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [117.193.2.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: enometh@meer.net) by smtp6.ctinetworks.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0DF7084B84; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:13:57 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <874kbl4e2a.fsf@gnus.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 28.0.50 X-ctinetworks-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ctinetworks-MailScanner-ID: 0DF7084B84.A718A X-ctinetworks-VirusCheck: Found to be clean X-ctinetworks-Watermark: 1630286043.00584@og6Q1yLFqQ4Ji5VWmy1xBA X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:212245 Archived-At: * Lars Ingebrigtsen <874kbl4e2a.fsf@gnus.org> Wrote on Thu, 19 Aug 2021 18:03:25 +0200 > Thanks; applied to Emacs 28. Thanks > This change (including the previous one) was small enough to apply > without assigning copyright to the FSF. > > I forget whether I've asked you before -- for future patches you > want to submit, it might make sense to get the paperwork started > now, so that subsequent patches can be applied speedily. Would you > be willing to sign such paperwork? Yes of course. Although I don't have any substantial contribution lined up right now, and I'd have to check the terms - (Gentoo wouln't let me sign off on commits as "Madhu " but insisted on a full name)