From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Boruch Baum Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48408: BUGFIX: window-default-font-height: check for nil string Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 00:00:53 -0400 Message-ID: <20210519040053.7u7n73smu2hnczap@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <20210514011519.vsy5jbhyxd4v6kpt@E15-2016.optimum.net> <83mtsxzund.fsf@gnu.org> <20210516030618.7caj6icukblavhbp@E15-2016.optimum.net> <835yzjwbnj.fsf@gnu.org> <20210516044215.23yd5ae3yeby6kaq@E15-2016.optimum.net> <83zgwvuu5z.fsf@gnu.org> <83tun3ur7h.fsf@gnu.org> <20210516065904.5wweuipi23oy5g2x@E15-2016.optimum.net> <83pmxrulm4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7697"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Cc: 48408@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 19 06:02:15 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ljDPT-0001r1-4e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 06:02:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57188 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ljDPR-0007N4-Mf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 00:02:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33768) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ljDPI-0007Mj-GB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 00:02:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46177) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ljDPF-0006lY-Ro for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 00:02:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ljDPF-00071O-Nj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 00:02:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Boruch Baum Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 04:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48408 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48408-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48408.162139687126932 (code B ref 48408); Wed, 19 May 2021 04:02:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48408) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 May 2021 04:01:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57723 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ljDOQ-00070K-OB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 00:01:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:49535) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ljDOJ-0006zb-8x for 48408@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 00:01:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1621396856; bh=GOWbDKD624YqokiCOqssDR0LYAxr3yTpWFTeAM1r1UE=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=SjnAObtU3uUs3EThDRHRXZqd44Ny/92vL6xSEHZcczhZdbgx0NK1yn9LJxAFCT5wc WYwdC4BhbmuYKU9I6MIey90aaKQFw9WLsp1qnOS1sLEYqrWb1lQdxlbFpJzh1TGqiA a82UFCU9n7mwAJdz6bXGtzKOSZrGWx1BlmD5UcCM= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([96.224.230.212]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M8QWG-1lndEW08zg-004RyT; Wed, 19 May 2021 06:00:56 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83pmxrulm4.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:vo0lJrYmtYhtP7oJXZGeNhYBrRXcn9ixnzJXdY+AhXO1Vr0ZORo SoYmPbWDrX53pam+1JJNgxxGZf0C8sWZuPkkq/j16x5oHi1CYipnrFPIUhkX7HTxLks5SMN gYXUoV8YSBz5jygPKJQLORBTbCFfHkM/JKZEu/ILqHjktBZkfxxq2PE8oAIA4nJ/wcKXCtq 8FmbRr1VQkVSxgcMMo2ew== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:Ke8NL+5tyq4=:KQ5gdjx/+nY4dBfDaNZKLL rDZKtC0eydxalHEhq6pOYTisaaTcw8YZr2DXBN0G++opy3Ly+I52byuHxQONqQhVEryh/9U6E HTCMV7FPi36+Q+9dpzdVIp6whcp8/6xsQm1M/7OZbl4QpwZvh4f6JUUba3J9IB57W2nd9GhKw px//Zg1yEFkjIR0Svn/vASGHm0GLWeWrFytiJPhjpvnTlM1B8oEzNaSxICOBeDSqjTLKoya9z 5w3T7wXfFa9sy3N5hofre0O2kdM8SqVZGxiKkJ305OKvsD2E8KhszSHxxW7TuOs6GWRIzFUxw VmTsc3gfrltnI+0bmYzHhrGBAJQS2+Xsw86nJSmWHUjfRMB8nYnVWNuD7zGUsfSyt0rJbENdB fhBETo3OPq4mbqrHAYLa+aj23mn5npX+aAm9xbxMuB2YxvUOSBJM8RcRVRLftbdmWzfoUsGsf ruibc8s6tkLOgcneIxUg8Uhxkh9exElse4MtTP2FEOo3iVevXRJtxkWTegUCV/DnZQB3g6KOd 8KaZoH+pdLSGqQImMxrNxaJwe1qu8XUDIjx3KjdKnR1vuHVO/n8kySORsWUwmHFz/IZ50kL/w NU48DApG/mDOgWufHBXGp0OcquKqswsLo7vSbhyYZ9TEubPrHiKqXsSo+O/OEsJTx/fVDRJRP RhgVbMiwHlRFLFlaKfr8fnCj7QJd2HTP3xPGEP7JPnstZ7nD7vmKsEYrEDFOG8TQc75Rq8KlY ODwcq07i9VqLFDoY9XaubTiaC0qDznWni/SndDu1GiM8/DhLHt0jRONfDUq08AE0Q/QGRERP X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:206853 Archived-At: On 2021-05-16 11:30, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Which is a Good Thing, because I've changed my mind. Please try the > much simpler patch below. > ... > - (if (and (display-multi-font-p (frame-parameter frame 'display)) > + (if (and (not (eq (framep frame) t)) > + (display-multi-font-p (frame-parameter frame 'display)) This patch does do the job; The bug does not happen with this patch. Two other things, though: 1) In working on this bug, I noticed that the mode line on the GUI frame was not correctly indicating the frame name. Should I file that as a separate bug? Add it to some other current outstanding bug? Let it stand as part of this report? 2) Likewise, for more than two years I've intermittently been having a 'grave' emacs bug that I never reported on this list because I couldn't ever figure out how to reproduce it. In working on this bug, I seem to have figured out the problem (but not a solution): 2.1) Whenever a minibuffer is active in one frame, the other windows on that frame are navigable and operable. However, all elements of all other frames are completely frozen. 2.2) This most commonly seems to have been happening to me when composing an email message using mutt, which I have configured to use emacsclient as its editor. 2.3) Up until now, my work-around has been to `pkill emacsclient` and restart the client (this doesn't cause any data loss, since all data is on the server). =2D- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0