From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Boruch Baum Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46364: regression in lm-commentary Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 13:55:02 -0500 Message-ID: <20210207185502.6lx67ptuysg3nflu@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <20210207140125.6rn7lfg33qnkb222@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87lfbzzpsm.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3121"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Cc: 46364@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 07 19:56:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l8pEB-0000hm-8Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 19:56:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60862 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8pEA-0002GD-BS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 13:56:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60938) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8pE1-0002G4-S4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 13:56:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37253) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8pE1-0001yk-KV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 13:56:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8pE1-0006hf-K0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 13:56:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Boruch Baum Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 18:56:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46364 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 46364-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46364.161272411525712 (code B ref 46364); Sun, 07 Feb 2021 18:56:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46364) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2021 18:55:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48799 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8pDH-0006gd-6U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 13:55:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:45283) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8pDE-0006gN-5Y for 46364@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 13:55:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1612724105; bh=b6YvCpsXaVox1FkQHvIy9C193lJlgrk8l3/pedPGQho=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=gdrhLrvnwTrZXiXR31cbqMKGlGOMfWwSAUEHOdvp43IE46mXc8AgpOEd0RpZ68Mim 89RhHKJjdmDgA7nPvhhYJw2JJ7xALabzjKjcVqC483V40gjvwV0tDXusIGAmf20oyS ScIa/qp0/eNu4zv/g/bpTZdWgIZhPJrYg6Y68YLU= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([70.19.86.82]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M9Wuq-1lEIrV254O-005dN2; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 19:55:05 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87lfbzzpsm.fsf@gnus.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:3yfgOIhwXEaDjjVEjhxkEQ13BKavg3hzYZ2n+RU0vtUymphAlL3 eOyI2zh8kVRu4MQw6swn0RkWIGucPKRx7UIeSz12oMd5O/dSu4HRoxxYKMva8unL5ECIC0r xiI5vGaKswdT0iKcX7no1tw43VMA8LkO3KNp+EdRba/Y3n+/PgLUnrOivDvSqfHR/z18+jV Bdmd9B+6fasAMUoMWbYMg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:CR3n0PJ8/7Q=:Zr/nbFRqgliwcnhqoUHLgm 9JyLDWYxWFl5Z9WDg73tQhp8VrMTJpoN7Lhx5GMak+W+X5GitrQhUNGfSKK9qWwX+wqXAab2O /c8xoEeS/e6Ze2zZMZTu9ZiLTs/S+MoGHpK+WdT4UG3gJqGhopg4DGCYtCTgOS6whK89kVU1Q wAV1sbgE/K8NtATgZ2sQzegCL8PvY0HkFw1ELrd1OojhmGmOV8pe2QD6WMZAa6QRPgxF73Awu alAUXQbpzdONxY6dfwwFejYLhtsG98NFCvHj3vHfqnzdEN66sbbDPOxn7Z5VCGkktfZGJgZLc L8MOH6nvoliRjGeQeyUjfZiKC1urVDcrG59RR5o83hGhhoWCHIYqcE6AYdmlyaPNVQNtRA1g+ h7mVgMRYbYhyZwxEVkdG4vBb3sbDn1KCkh0gZVRsHPUeBwBo8QocLh3o62oxclxzX/I7Wt1fN OEnU8LdiXSd3FSqjwyz29b1M4b22ktdLK38fP61x2fxfuu7TMO9c536XYNNm6InEQrvmkRPRz iB/D0T7ByjUV+chfkjGCHxhazYUYYMwwkKqt1/rew1/Zjukzypin5w4XG/dCEwg5QheN9e8UE 7FHpEbSTke5Av39aqJ7YfB05QlB3HSZcar5dTaxCpVL8Fv0QTRYlDGKMiswZIY5majsCtOJSi IDGLVPHHPsZFEaGnvk0/TeRH42I/njVpQFDVeag6v7RX3iBULfuXx8Z86wh4E7T86NPAdI+Tp hZXi7syI3qBKpU0Tl9JoGojhTKpUDEShm0tEtEwzjC1NbSMOxNS3dfVE8ishtnp6E66wf/2E X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:199542 Archived-At: On 2021-02-07 19:38, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Boruch Baum writes: > > > In emacs 26, lm-commentary functions fine. > > In the emacs-snapshot that I'm using from ~2020-09, it does not > > correctly indent sub headings. > > > > This was observed for the lisp file[1], as processed by MELPA[2], and > > reproduced by me locally. I don't know what version MELPA is using. > > I'm not sure how Melpa is involved here? I thought I was clear about that. They produced the problem. I gave you links to the file, and the MELPA URL of the erroneous output, and the URL of the github discussion. > Is the problem that (lm-commentary "/that/file") doesn't return the > correct result on some particular file? Isn't that what I wrote? What was't clear about what I wrote? I'm looking at it now and I don't see any ambiguity. > If so, can you include the file here in the bug tracker, as well as > instructions for how to reproduce the bug? You know what, Lars, just forget it. Just forget I ever reported this bug. Go ahead and close it. I'm not in the mood today for this. Let someone else report it sometime in the future and deal with =2D- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0