From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Boruch Baum Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43961: read carefully: dired-file-name-at-point vs dired-filename-at-point Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:19:11 -0400 Message-ID: <20201014041910.s26b2w2yksgbtwqo@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <20201012142522.m24zmrzzuiiao4ck@E15-2016.optimum.net> <20201013040807.xk2q54jnquthda7y@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87blh667zs.fsf@gnus.org> <20201013102511.5nuu3p3dcyr6poft@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87blh531xs.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16739"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Cc: 43961@debbugs.gnu.org, Richard Stallman To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 14 06:20:54 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kSYHV-0004FZ-MQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 06:20:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46564 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSYHU-0007Av-0f for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:20:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49142) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSYGg-0007Af-EI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38119) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSYGg-0006DE-0F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kSYGf-0001TI-Nm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:20:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Boruch Baum Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 04:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43961 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 43961-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43961.16026491635597 (code B ref 43961); Wed, 14 Oct 2020 04:20:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43961) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Oct 2020 04:19:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49665 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kSYG3-0001SD-JI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:19:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:36689) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kSYG0-0001Rv-Mr for 43961@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:19:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1602649154; bh=Er2t4DeMoNHbTkDDVQY+/88ggLCY2YVG3YwjD0/iRS0=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=L7N0rzMLdHYqnpfkr+q7AYXPsToAEwxAHv52KyobBIhGj7BHGOZwj2NtaoP274KyX mcGsFHFClGo2nw7dzM9UQXHIMHODGPneXzCqcqEPxjC+MWq4ZtPr4fJt/uZe4U3Qlk LQoFqswt3cxLAMeBHwOmMH9geu7WjlqTuHRCvYRw= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([72.89.170.172]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N5VD8-1kPoSp418c-016veN; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 06:19:14 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87blh531xs.fsf@gnus.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:5eQz+u3iV49ynfgmF8GxfP+9Mr1JxS3PJ2rMKYMer7wLYNpKERo uEpq8QwX0NQmoS/ZkXgduO0ESHkBW0V2pcUiT5IF/+HQ5ycftPW6uqcyrGQR8cSXZ4lC2z8 urQdSPvDXgNnJZNOpm50xblJGwMN2DebYkcW1ZnLQ2cZArdY0OM8HlMAmvcCW8oO4YWoI+L QRV+BF8El4hY2dlf4rkyg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:AGD8KhrK/vI=:R+QWLu9ZniBPVt8AZ2JqZG 7zj6x3zlSJ4XJntzk6eBe66fRfLPAzQ5x2gZ2iCf9X7b5WiCBmrswe9XipIAiFagb+7gauJhx hIJqV9gd1lEBMTp219uXHmF78ELsMgwMQ5tvvGxzYArdOSnCWeplL1cFNZG64XEj3P6jtIicc JUR2GWjO4a2RcT2E/PFZOdE3dWM23hn/VBJB+RNN0+5Ume/PO1BmZXH1AbeSeTsjt5B2YeL6K ZtS3i9o0khV6XGvgtJGm4LjyvAal8l1ALGWnjXN4dLdl5Akru8B8ssHFWVIlteZLaRHxp9SPc 0xtkom350bbu8othgATH1pnUUk0dmgK7XK/D+tY4MS/EVArV9YevIc+4HmXLj8GkJuKDd7zUY GF21eVR4PM+1pWzRODViBCenibaf5W0nVDOhv4kUmU2npO4EQndunN7dTSw/zB0W6LLD1OHgG 6Hs9AHiYOLG8lulIvZnuNXRMV3ALwc+nltvmTsHfx+ZztRP/RSHzxT8qfRkHjFUGM3rD5UE1w YExEWCPRY+ieKXxIrqutDEB1yHOMUDo5AE1ebhLd3ynRmYC9npP4clZspyQLTlqMMBEqZhAXE dEIsbUfflQXAxJzRgZp0WrcXyL/LxxHLmz/g1DISGkC658TktKbSilV1+Q+WiqU79t5ym9y72 PMXdu8eNBCyx40KJ0zWA40UG1Y303TLjPkcYRTKzQaeciywhgNIoJe3uO8h5c7qCpylkfzuTo j8hzI3GLV+I3lKkL6tahwTuaTq5ATbr3UxDeJpS11WTrajcwurtFGZb/moV95l2AIGqjpQj3 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:190466 Archived-At: On 2020-10-14 05:45, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > It's not about code efficiency -- whether this function is efficient or > not doesn't make any difference, since we'd deprecate it, and change the > callers. > Sorry, I don't think this is a good change. Renaming these functions > just because we have two almost identical ones (when we should just > remove one of them) doesn't make much sense. Maybe you're catching me on a bad day, but I don't have the patience to continue this discussion. IMO, you're making a glaringly bad call. If my presentation was inadequate, that's on me; I can't present any clearer than I have already done previously on this thread, so someone else is going to need to carry the ball on this, or maybe you'll re-read the thread more carefully and change your mind. I'm moving on to other issues. =2D- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0