From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5953: 23.1.95; objc-mode doesn't fontify Objective-C 2.0 keywords @syntesize and @property correctly Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 19:24:56 +0000 Message-ID: <20200524192456.GB6253@ACM> References: <87o8xvzicx.fsf@gnus.org> <874kyuohtq.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7wwzfiw.fsf@stefankangas.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="51773"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 5953@debbugs.gnu.org, Lars Ingebrigtsen , Aleksandr Skobelev , Leo To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 24 21:25:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jcwFB-000DLY-UB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 24 May 2020 21:25:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51982 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jcwFA-0008Kf-GW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 24 May 2020 15:25:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37394) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jcwF4-0008KY-GC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2020 15:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55487) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jcwF4-0007dR-6s; Sun, 24 May 2020 15:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jcwF4-0000KK-2b; Sun, 24 May 2020 15:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-cc-mode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 19:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 5953 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,cc-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 5953-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5953.15903483001246 (code B ref 5953); Sun, 24 May 2020 19:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 May 2020 19:25:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38800 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jcwF2-0000K2-Fx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2020 15:25:00 -0400 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:11143 helo=mail.muc.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jcwF1-0000Jt-Kf for 5953@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2020 15:25:00 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 31195 invoked by uid 3782); 24 May 2020 19:24:57 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p4fe15a02.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.225.90.2]) by localhost.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Sun, 24 May 2020 21:24:56 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 12190 invoked by uid 1000); 24 May 2020 19:24:56 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h7wwzfiw.fsf@stefankangas.se> X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:180923 Archived-At: Hello, Stefan. Sorry for the long delay in answering. On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 02:53:59 +0200, Stefan Kangas wrote: > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > >> It seems like this patch (from seven years ago) was never applied. I > >> know nothing about Objective C, though. Alan, could you have a look at > >> this? > > Alan, did you find time to look at this patch? It looks fairly > > straightforward to me, but my knowledge of Objective C is very > > rudimentary. > That was 23 weeks ago. Alan, did you find any time to look at this > patch? Thanks in advance. I've been trying to come to some sort of conclusion on this for quite a long time now. Somehow, adding nine keywords together with their semantics seems to go outside the bounds of "trivial" for copyright purposes, even if they do fit into the arbitrary maximum number of lines. Kudos to Martin Stjernholm, my predecessor, who made such compact amendments possible. I don't know if Leo Liu, the author of the patch, has signed copyright papers, but I strongly suspect not. As I say, I don't know what to do with this patch. > Best regards, > Stefan Kangas -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).