From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Roland Winkler" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2975: texinfo-master-menu and emacs.texi Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 14:54:55 -0600 Message-ID: <20193.9247.697042.440983@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <20191.48632.665251.448872@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20191.55423.572257.75919@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <877h27gxh2.fsf@gmail.com> <20193.1889.937384.407090@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <8739cuhohm.fsf@gmail.com> <83wra6am86.fsf@gnu.org> <20111208195957.GA19297@headley> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1323377724 17786 80.91.229.12 (8 Dec 2011 20:55:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 20:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2975@debbugs.gnu.org, karl@freefriends.org To: "Stepan Nemec" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 08 21:55:20 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RYkzr-0003qs-TP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:55:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37539 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RYkzr-0003ns-E8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:55:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36190) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RYkzp-0003nn-82 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:55:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RYkzo-0000s7-CQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:55:13 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58859) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RYkzo-0000rx-80 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:55:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RYl0c-0000gP-8A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:56:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Roland Winkler" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 20:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 2975 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2975-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B2975.13233777562612 (code B ref 2975); Thu, 08 Dec 2011 20:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2975) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2011 20:55:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RYl0W-0000g4-Ey for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:55:56 -0500 Original-Received: from essmail.ess.niu.edu ([131.156.1.18]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RYl0U-0000fx-11 for 2975@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:55:54 -0500 Original-Received: from regnitz (lukas.physics.niu.edu [131.156.85.221]) by essmail.ess.niu.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pB8Ksv8j023687; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 14:54:58 -0600 (CST) In-Reply-To: <20111208195957.GA19297@headley> X-Mailer: VM 8.2 trial under 24.0.90.2 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:56:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54826 Archived-At: On Thu Dec 8 2011 =A6t p=E1n N mec wrote: > So, given that makeinfo can add the info itself when needed, is there= > really ever any need for listing the node pointers explicitly at all?= If Karl or whoever could answer this question with a clear "no, these node pointers are never needed" (say, for recent versions of makeinfo and other tools for formatting info pages) this could make things much easier! Roland