unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: yyoncho@gmail.com, 38406@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#38406: 27.0.50; post-self-insert-hook does not hold its contract in cc-mode derived modes
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 18:31:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191202183156.GA4175@ACM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83blsrn58a.fsf@gnu.org>

Hello, Eli.

On Sun, Dec 01, 2019 at 22:47:01 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2019 19:27:09 +0000
> > Cc: yyoncho@gmail.com, 38406@debbugs.gnu.org
> > From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>

> > post-self-insert-hook's functions, unusually amongs hooks, interfere
> > with its triggering event.  This contrasts with, say,
> > after-change-functions, where the functions don't insert into or
> > delete from the buffer, or pre-redisplay-functions, where the
> > functions don't try to prevent a particular window getting
> > displayed.

> You'd be surprised to know what some of those hooks do.  Everything
> you say they don't, and then some.

Any chance you could name one (or even two), thus letting me see for
myself?

> There's nothing we can do to prevent people from shooting themselves
> in the foot or hanging themselves with the rope we provided.

In the case of post-self-insert-hook, the damaging functions are part of
Emacs itself, not crazy user-written code.

> And if you think you are the only one who needs to harden your code to
> let people do the craziest things with these hooks, please don't think
> so: you are definitely not alone.

OK.

> But breaking a hook's contract as a means to teach people not to shoot
> themselves in the foot is not right.  If the uses are legitimate, they
> should be able to do them; if they aren't, let them cope with the
> consequences.

> > So to call this hook at the end of c-electric-brace would mean having to
> > filter the hook first (at the very least, to remove
> > electric-pair-post-self-insert-function), which just seems very hackish
> > and unsatisfactory.

> It doesn't seem too hackish to me, and as a nice bonus we will have
> post-self-insert-hook act as per its contract again.

> So could you please do that?  TIA.

OK, I'll do that.  It's not a nice thing to do, but we're kind of
lacking nice things in this situation.  Give me a few days, please - I'm
a touch busy in RL at the moment.

Additionally, how about reversing the encouragement in the Elisp manual
to put buffer changing functions onto post-self-insert-hook?

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).





  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-02 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-27 20:00 bug#38406: 27.0.50; post-self-insert-hook does not hold its contract in cc-mode derived modes yyoncho
2019-11-30 14:36 ` Alan Mackenzie
2019-12-01 10:02   ` yyoncho
2019-12-01 15:07     ` Alan Mackenzie
2019-12-01 15:27       ` yyoncho
2019-12-01 15:58         ` Alan Mackenzie
2019-12-01 18:03           ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-12-02 18:37             ` Alan Mackenzie
2019-12-01 17:59       ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-12-01 19:27         ` Alan Mackenzie
2019-12-01 20:47           ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-12-02 18:31             ` Alan Mackenzie [this message]
2019-12-02 20:17               ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-12-04 20:41             ` Alan Mackenzie
2019-12-04 21:04               ` Dmitry Gutov
2019-12-05 19:14                 ` Alan Mackenzie
2019-12-05 20:44                   ` Dmitry Gutov
2019-12-05 14:45               ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-12-05 19:09                 ` Alan Mackenzie
2019-12-05 19:25                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-12-05 20:17                     ` Alan Mackenzie
2019-12-06  8:06                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-12-06 18:28                         ` Alan Mackenzie
2019-12-06 18:48                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-12-06 22:24                             ` Alan Mackenzie
2019-12-07  8:21                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-12-07 11:40                                 ` Alan Mackenzie
2019-12-07 13:27                                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-12-07 19:03                                     ` Alan Mackenzie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191202183156.GA4175@ACM \
    --to=acm@muc.de \
    --cc=38406@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=yyoncho@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).