From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Klein Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#32722: [O] bug#32722: bug#32722: bug#32722: 26.1; Org-publish depend on non-free platform ? Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 20:53:29 +0200 Organization: roklein.de Message-ID: <20180918205329.2e12c16f@happy.intern.roklein.de> References: <531a7f93882cc0d5d09700457d06ea082f47569b.camel@flqt.fr> <83sh2ck42e.fsf@gnu.org> <87va73gn90.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <83efdqg32d.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1537296839 1552 195.159.176.226 (18 Sep 2018 18:53:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 18:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: n@flqt.fr, kaushal.modi@gmail.com, 32722@debbugs.gnu.org, rjhorniii@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 18 20:53:54 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g2L8D-0000I7-Nn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 20:53:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42141 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g2LAJ-0001gL-4U for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:56:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57851) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g2L8O-0008M2-Og for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:54:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g2L8O-00048n-1F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:54:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40513) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g2L8L-00045N-UO; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:54:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g2L8L-0007g0-NF; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:54:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Klein Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 18:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32722 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,org-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 32722-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32722.153729683829496 (code B ref 32722); Tue, 18 Sep 2018 18:54:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32722) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2018 18:53:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44771 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g2L8I-0007fg-12 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:53:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.133]:42177) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g2L8G-0007fM-8P for 32722@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:53:56 -0400 Original-Received: from happy.intern.roklein.de ([91.67.155.33]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue009 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mt6wz-1fmizP0OID-00tVIe; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 20:53:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83efdqg32d.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-unknown-openbsd6.3) X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:GgUmoP20YJn5+3T5BfPNQ0OmUw8OSSanp5gJzgV0u1q0silAyim psogKXe0ogooKrjR7Wu02u1ruIGN65nVIub+4Yig0RfOOX2TVTIWebihq85AQXEsnxm/71l uyH1Gev8ZlGIjhb6VLlLG2mt3/+g1Z0Qn8iJPfZRK3Kr+kgOQDjGNHgH6yziU1mwcJDFPAz nJBFnWsYdxLjJRvMZd/gg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:m9N3n57vqJs=:KmebWZ9rfB3+ue15CWlGZS jn2JJsrQO6Bs8GTQKEhQTEzKS9d59TxcSOZt/2cth/Jc4UN1Bx2a5/U2DHqUuAhpmBx4Hbj1r DSVFPgSQ61weOeCWYtwJA6zV6yb9ULcbcMeejJB+hWKXMdG1Cg+6QdPfAmpjD79+JjImKY1c/ idNhtaTVOflMYltlq2s571co+7iuAwNbHB/zp8sWoBud1Q+7bOR9LiFQnyMOQNYQIcjN1KOl3 UD4vI9fXcU0s3t4rHS2xGfWWQ7LOUM6yvdfVSMzdMbTW50l08fic2GJnFQurCBI6uV9RjdCua Fwrh8rl08M26MwMbPDvr8lXbiz8aV7q8TiNekNTCUdVV+6Wbds+iseI9EAQL0kb6qAWdtHofB 8HDrUQlXUiDgAPwVSiUkq9dbxOUCATtfXSGPmuytMr7Y3I1+pJf2Ix0ZA1tL4Q1OteYtNpKoX BoWJ+xhe9TY8QcJQr+cR48tKZXYME6NqPOSKMHWdr0JJFaWRbJeT7PG9/w70tSZrzo32Zbo+c RA5s2uvWpT4NkBEyw41fExRwESxNQbdh4kYFqgo5RnRqG+Fr4GP8EYrXWMbPF9UfnE0VFXUdP 78tD9RbmFLyNf40RK6wCBFuFO+hwO94Jly9YBM/bDHLxn5pwm5EwORtBYQt3o5WA4kfR2//mk 6t5WevjWxLtf0fdMbibRSqtlvChHRVtYsehdwRjqwDHPCE/A765KXrAHzRdAcG1blAnMb1bf5 lpCA896jVCoG0WVM X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:150415 Archived-At: On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:53:14 +0300 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Robert Horn > > Cc: Nicolas Goaziou , Eli Zaretskii > > , kaushal.modi@gmail.com, 32722@debbugs.gnu.org, > > rms@gnu.org Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:37:45 -0400 > > > > /* from RMS email later in thread > > To motivate people to do this, I say we shouild not ship another > > release with that reference to GitHub. Eli, do you agree? > > */ > > > > This makes it clearly the reference to Github that is the concern. > > We have quite a few references to GitHub in Emacs, just grep for it. > > > That's, what the original message on the bug list refers to, however. I think the original bug report is bogus. Especially in view of your statement above. As already pointed out by Nicolas Goaziou, org-mode also requires other external stuff (just as htmlfontify does, see my mail and its manual: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_mono/htmlfontify.html#Requirements). The reason, e.g. LaTeX isn't mentioned explicitly in the manual or in org is that it is a well-known software. The link is only given as a friendly hint. Also, in regards to the original bug report, while htmlize is _hosted_ on github, which indeed is not free, htmlize itself _is_ free. Right at the beginning of htmlize.el it says: ;; This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify ;; it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by ;; the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) ;; any later version. When the original poster doesn't want to use htmlize, he probably should try to export without fontifying source code (I think there's a switch, but I'm not sure). Best regards Robert