From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan Third Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19977: 24.4; Incorrect translation of Super modifier with Ctrl or Meta on OS X Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 20:18:28 +0000 Message-ID: <20180204201828.GA42949@breton.holly.idiocy.org> References: <834mbowuxw.fsf@gnu.org> <20171226211603.GA82103@breton.holly.idiocy.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1517775452 14586 195.159.176.226 (4 Feb 2018 20:17:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 20:17:32 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) Cc: adrian.b.robert@gmail.com, 19977@debbugs.gnu.org To: Philipp Stephani Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 04 21:17:28 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eiQir-0002Rn-SN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 21:17:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35042 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eiQkt-00087T-6h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 15:19:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52210) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eiQkl-00085L-Fc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 15:19:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eiQkg-0005qS-N6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 15:19:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49461) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eiQkg-0005qJ-Hx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 15:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eiQkg-0000l3-Cp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 15:19:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Third Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 20:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19977 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 19977-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19977.15177755172881 (code B ref 19977); Sun, 04 Feb 2018 20:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19977) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2018 20:18:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57358 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eiQkH-0000kP-JM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 15:18:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]:33188) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eiQkG-0000kC-HI for 19977@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 15:18:36 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id x4-v6so10330522wmc.0 for <19977@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 12:18:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=J0hsHKVMz7V8GP9DYiTazmiwKE7E28CtxnNT43ccGRw=; b=TZ90V9tNYNjAnf8E0AF1dl6srmtXiBvMtxdN+cTZcaCwYHiq9puGnJwrk7Sw81qTjS UCBk2oNPJUBrNA4lYFBzhZi8cyi5vIothqQZz+uTLXdZXStYKBTDgijbGo/K432lMIGY hTwnDQcrrk7/heKJZrsXUqnB89ckdzQD8FisNoac2CO1IuenqTBSroe2PfV90Szd8wv9 0ZcbxzLWLjr0txQQWPYHBHyOAFe+eszjIWO+r5i71IpEUF2r2uMNQBGuEY9AztZChJ6S 6D3whgwp48jHHyefCjG/e2EjtXc5YeD8lTiOB44G+NT+JSDemzJkCXfk+Te6iqOwfcqU MjRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=J0hsHKVMz7V8GP9DYiTazmiwKE7E28CtxnNT43ccGRw=; b=jnH1Y4vbEEdCqltt+3+XvF0ag9ZXG2l5TJ2+8K66j5eLqLq+zMVuiwV5gjHsDaR6JJ UWnyGuZj4A+GTwiWag7querI22sQsmJLRCUXuf3b9HeAib3Nt2hZjfF2ZIBopCowqrnX ZA4EIDUzfZseqUmzQkmKQdAgu0Oa2qPlNp96BU6rJ+0UAYqDaSwope7D+Q++Gas1Kb+c 3bIufpp/8afci5MC40atmWCb5WjZypXT2WqKf0cS4S6DxsOnd1ex37HZ8kafGTIe8gPH pcVqjYgrmCrJcPR6A+QGXKq/0Wq2XA2BD2JNCDWDclAVbI95ZKSYPmj8OBcfby6Aup3U gMSg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfSxSDpxcImfPBtRa+qnFpO63j5HoajlREtNPF7Jes5vOMKJwTG GVWC/EABMhRBcOfNOkNmn/A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2264OiF9tWw9Em8BfO2e3KgXVfYam5NE3oi6TU1xb1VRynDTuq4iqqmkxvw0980TsdGUFFPmHg== X-Received: by 10.28.154.67 with SMTP id c64mr36714098wme.125.1517775510771; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 12:18:30 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from breton.holly.idiocy.org (ip6-2001-08b0-03f8-8129-cccf-7143-dd46-9afe.holly.idiocy.org. [2001:8b0:3f8:8129:cccf:7143:dd46:9afe]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v20sm1896064wrd.32.2018.02.04.12.18.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 04 Feb 2018 12:18:30 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:142903 Archived-At: On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 07:07:14PM +0000, Philipp Stephani wrote: > > > > I can’t quite work this out from a quick look at the code, but is it > > the case that when option or command is bound to meta or super then it > > acts as a control‐like modifier, but when it’s unbound then it acts as > > a shift‐like modifier? > > > > The macOS code doesn't check whether certain keystrokes are bound. Rather, > it uses the ns-FOO-modifier customization options. That’s what I meant. Bind was a bad choice of word. > I think it should be a significant improvement in practice. I'd suggest to > apply it and see whether we get any complaints. I expect we’ll get a few folk complaining that they’ve bound some exotic looking key combination (C-π, C-¥, etc.) that no longer works, but yes, I think we should apply it and see what happens. -- Alan Third