From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan Third Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23753: 25.0.95; configuration of X client fails to include graphics libraries on Mac OS X 10.6.8 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 19:07:03 +0000 Message-ID: <20171212190703.GA88265@breton.holly.idiocy.org> References: <20171210224225.GA78715@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <20171211210123.GA79080@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <20171212171830.GA79643@breton.holly.idiocy.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1513105695 22939 195.159.176.226 (12 Dec 2017 19:08:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 19:08:15 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Cc: peter_dyballa@freenet.de, 23753@debbugs.gnu.org, "Charles A. Roelli" , rms@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 12 20:08:09 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOpuT-0005cK-79 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 20:08:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60084 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOpua-0007vD-7j for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:08:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50811) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOpuR-0007v0-0q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:08:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOpuN-00019W-2A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:08:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50207) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOpuM-00019Q-UP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOpuM-0008IO-G4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:08:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Third Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 19:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23753 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23753-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23753.151310563331817 (code B ref 23753); Tue, 12 Dec 2017 19:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23753) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2017 19:07:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58887 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOptZ-0008H7-Ek for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:07:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr0-f169.google.com ([209.85.128.169]:46269) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOptY-0008Gv-3d for 23753@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:07:12 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr0-f169.google.com with SMTP id x49so22196410wrb.13 for <23753@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:07:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=RP+8+FZ9+/94U+n+D+joDWIxCa538my8mea3cNMqTEI=; b=RhlbhFos2CjlDowKVdsIvzhhiYXz6Xr493wJQlorZlUJmG8D2Lx7MRWGjWbchEmYei UjMxyvNLUTjpcdJ6X1tMpyaQnA2YdvDKWTE3I7uPlNJrJWOIQIU477D3QwhurMBmDeYU 77L56aIBzCtgzXi1n+4NqXNUgAMAeBDpKJKJ0bX/ETQvmD5O+1B6/c1tiWJ/hClrXYAH mGbIqe4vv3s9j5Ek2kQVjrcVtQCER0D4wXFWEHviAoq5/38Gbwbrx9q90SbOll4VQLLz Opy9O9/Tgi0Ho/5I++jvZVjNi0rp0KG4u3Nd83INbvjal4JERql1Z9XljwBjtbcAEJot ccJw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=RP+8+FZ9+/94U+n+D+joDWIxCa538my8mea3cNMqTEI=; b=HrRjYu1F+sI0yYn+rJvJBSF5fo7uc48MM72qSWVpCpv+MJFtJ5+nyObqmJWz0whMYq XaIOpO4hjGs8sClRtBt9ioOqYlwso/bvXGv9mu+HGx9Y+WaIa4mWTsk3BvjOWVfG2CtJ D+LEAEZQZvJlqDF+xaB2wDvKhCod7Pq7noqnVwuI8ShNDAxZwBBKJ/7ZMMehc6gLduc/ S+eNwnFVDYIEgQLfNJDB8XTxVdQdP8uxzlxWlXjiORJtt3Ct4IBkdZj2E84wvJq86DQv hP9KToL6f2pvDYDzvZFwBwfVHRnOqjnZKD0t5F63xOp9l/dfbAw88B9KLDHbIYAWSGBD LRCg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mIMDxkbQzinKl5oBy1I0WtRQzxiJaxyfAgYpk7IUOebVrgWBrKX 1YXg3LAiYqnIXx6EDbsNJCs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBosmwB2+GduQDvBktPDLJdFJtUGki1v32cmMllvEjWAqWNrMj9aEr7XGDUnm4Os6cQOkWzzT0A== X-Received: by 10.223.199.203 with SMTP id y11mr5078066wrg.37.1513105626174; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:07:06 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from breton.holly.idiocy.org (ip6-2001-08b0-03f8-8129-09c7-7705-5027-72ca.holly.idiocy.org. [2001:8b0:3f8:8129:9c7:7705:5027:72ca]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a71sm160451wme.33.2017.12.12.11.07.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:07:04 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:140994 Archived-At: On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:46:39PM -0500, Glenn Morris wrote: > Alan Third wrote: > > > I've pushed a change to master to inline the two blocks. > > I believe rms had asked that this be fixed for the next release, > ie it should have gone to the emacs-26 branch. Ah, my mistake. Sorry. How do I put it in emacs-26 so it doesn’t cause problems at the next merge? (Or do I have to do the next merge in order to clean it up?) -- Alan Third