From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Winston Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28403: 25.2; find-tag works, but xref-find-definitions Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:37 EDT Message-ID: <201709141737.v8EHb6Ao038578@psr.com> References: <201709092240.v89MeFUo014854@psr.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505410689 8675 195.159.176.226 (14 Sep 2017 17:38:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 17:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 28403@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 14 19:38:05 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dsY5U-00028d-NY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 19:38:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49136 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsY5b-0001qO-W3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:38:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36651) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsY5W-0001q7-K9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:38:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsY5T-0004vC-Ge for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:38:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60924) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsY5T-0004uy-DG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dsY5R-0001QA-Ro for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <201709092240.v89MeFUo014854@psr.com> Resent-From: Winston Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 17:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28403 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28403-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28403.15054106305402 (code B ref 28403); Thu, 14 Sep 2017 17:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28403) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2017 17:37:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41372 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dsY4c-0001P2-AF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:37:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.psr.com ([67.212.42.216]:24537 helo=psr.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dsY4Y-0001OY-LT for 28403@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:37:08 -0400 Original-Received: from psr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by psr.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v8EHb6Gv038579 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:37:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wbe@psr.com) Original-Received: (from wbe@localhost) by psr.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v8EHb6Ao038578; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:37:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wbe) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:136968 Archived-At: Dmitry suggested: > Maybe the manual should advertise the necessity to call etags with > --regexp in certain cases more prominently instead. On the assumption that no one will read the manual until they have to, I'd still suggest at least a 1-sentence mention of the issue in the documentation for xref-find-definitions, even if it mostly says see the manual if you're having problems finding tags. -WBE